User talk:Good Boy 1

June 2017

Your addition to Chakravyuha (2016 film) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Diff: [1] Content you added in this edit can be found verbatim here. "Do not copy" is a basic academic concept. We expect editors to understand this. If you add content you've lifted from other sources again, your editing privileges will be revoked. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:53, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Same thing here, which appears here and here, which appears here, and here, which appears here. You haven't gotten off on the right foot at Wikipedia. Please see WP:FILMPLOT, which wants plot summaries in the 400-700 word range, not one-sentence loglines. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:58, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good Boy 1, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Good Boy 1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted, as you did at Sparsha Rekha. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:25, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Content about Sparsha Rekha's career that you added to the article you wrote about her can be found verbatim at https://chiloka.com/celebrity/sparsha-rekha. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:26, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Good Boy 1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Dear Cyphoidbomb, I thought that copying text is mistake if we do not add reference. So I copied text, Pasted it and added reference. Now, I know the term. Sorry for violating Wikipedia's term. Please unblock me

Decline reason:

This doesn't actually tell us what you should have done differently, doesn't show you understand WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FU. Please make another unblock request and indicate what you should have done differently in order to adhere to our policies. Thanks. Yamla (talk) 13:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I thought the very basic "do not copy" admonishment I left above was fairly unambiguous. If you plan to edit this academic resource, you need a familiarity with fundamental academic rules. Did you ever write a report in school? Did you just copy passages from other books until you reached the word limit, or was there an expectation that you write the content in your own voice? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:16, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Tracklist"

It's not "Tracklist". It's supposed to be "Track listing". Please see WP:MOSALBUM on how to properly format an album article. --Jennica✿ / ^talk 22:04, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ABCD 2 (soundtrack)

The article ABCD 2 (soundtrack) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of independent notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 20:54, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]