User talk:Gorsbren
|
Possibly unfree Image:Memorialoverhead.JPG
[edit]An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Memorialoverhead.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. fuzzy510 05:29, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:Memorial stadium.jpg
[edit]An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Memorial stadium.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. fuzzy510 05:31, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Series %
[edit]I'm not going to add the %'s back, but I think having the win % is pretty helpful. At a quick glance of the table, I can't personally tell that 164-71 is actually more dominant than 174-90, so it's nice to have the percentage. Then again, i'm no mental math genius and maybe you are ;-). At the very least, i don't really see what the harm is in leaving it? The Coaches table on the very same page also has overall %... Ryan2845 (talk) 13:11, 25 August 2008 (UTC) Oh and as far as clutter, why not remove the "KU" in front of all the series then? As you said: "you can tell the state of the series by viewing the number of wins vs. losses"... Ryan2845 (talk) 13:15, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Big 12 basketball
[edit]Based on your heavy editorial involvement in 2008–09 Kansas Jayhawks men's basketball team and 2008–09 Oklahoma Sooners men's basketball team, I thought you might be interested in creating a 2008–09 Big 12 Conference men's basketball season article. I have created a 2008–09 Big Ten Conference men's basketball season and there is a 2008–09 Atlantic Coast Conference men's basketball season both of which may serve as guides. I have recently convinced the Big East to begin 2008–09 Big East Conference men's basketball season. If you are interested and have any questions, drop me a note.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 14:43, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Based on your hard work on the Arizona Wildcats men's basketball, I thought you might be interested in creating an article for the 2008–09 Pacific-10 Conference men's basketball season. The 2008–09 Big Ten Conference men's basketball season and 2008–09 Atlantic Coast Conference men's basketball season articles have been going since before the conference tournaments and recently 2008–09 Big East Conference men's basketball season and 2008–09 Big 12 Conference men's basketball season have recently been created. I hope to encourage all the power conferences to create such articles this year or at least by next year. In fact, next year I hope to get all the mid majors in on the action too. I do the 2008–09 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team and the 2008–09 Big Ten Conference men's basketball season and am willing to respond to any queries.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 09:20, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
ITS NOT VANDALIZING!
[edit]First off, its not vandalizing what I'm doing. It is completly stupid the way you want to have it. You dont have the tournaments liked to in the header, you dont have the round listed for each round of the big 12 tournament, for it to just say Phillips 66 Big 12 Tournament conveys less information then the way I had it. Plus having it say the same thing for each round is redundant. And midwest subregional? Really? Does anybody know it as that? It should say Midwest Region first and second round if anything. So dont accuse me of vandalizing just because its not the way you want it. The way I have it is less confussing and has more information its NOT VANDALIZING. If anything you are vandalizing it for insisting that it look worse then it could be!Bsuorangecrush (talk) 01:24, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Your words (When you remove information from a page that is relevant, that constitutes vandalism)...but I did not remove any relevant information. I took the information and phrased it in a better way, I didn't remove anything. Thats where I got mad, was being accused of vandalism when my intention was to improve that page. I even have gone back to that page a few times since that loss to Northern Iowa to check on idiots who have vandalized it, like an edit that put loss in the second round as a preseason accolade or the edit that put KU fielded the biggest bunch of weak-ass over rated pussies ever fielded in the NCAA Tournament and got their asses handed to them by lowly unranked Northern Iowa in the 2nd round., thats vandalism, not waht I did.Bsuorangecrush (talk) 01:53, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)