User talk:Gracelouisad

Welcome!

Hello, Gracelouisad, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Well done on creating the article! I am no expert in that field so I am not sure if people would consider the article notable, but if it is, then good job! Hope to see many more like that get created. Calaka (talk) 08:52, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of India Napier

I have nominated India Napier, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India Napier. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jack Merridew 10:32, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Noah Cyrus, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Noah Cyrus was changed by Gracelouisad (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-05-14T01:54:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chelsea Lately. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chelsea Lately was changed by Gracelouisad (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-05-14T02:00:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:00, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Chelsea Lately. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Traxs 7 02:02, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Adrienne Bailon. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Traxs 7 02:03, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 02:09, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The project's content policies require that all articles be written from a neutral point of view, and not introduce bias or give undue weight to viewpoints. Please bear this in mind when making edits such as your recent edit to Hannah Montana: The Movie. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 07:25, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again,as you did at Tyra Banks‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 08:10, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Vanessa Hudgens, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 01:47, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Zac Efron. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 01:49, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Samantha Ronson. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 01:49, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 01:52, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gracelouisad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven't done anything wrong! I added constructive critisism. It was NOT vandalism!

Decline reason:

And this is constructive how? Please read our guide to requesting an unblock or you will find your ability to edit this page removed. TN X Man 02:11, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.