User talk:Gregeroszlar

Welcome!

Hello, Gregeroszlar, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Greger Oszlar, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Atlantic306 (talk) 04:07, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Greger Oszlar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Greger Oszlar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 04:07, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have an obvious conflict of interest. Please don't write about yourself, your friends or relatives, and read the guidance below:

When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above.

Also see WP:Notability (music) Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:01, 26 December 2019 (UTC)</nowiki>[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:07, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you because:

You have ignored the guidance you've been given and just dumped unreferenced text as if this were social media.

You have removed the guidance you have been given from this talk page, now restored.

You seem to have no purpose here other than to write about yourself. If you are notable enough as defined above, someone will write an article about you, if you are not notable on our criteria, you won't get an article whether it's true or not.

When the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you just carry on self-promoting, the next block will be indefinite. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:13, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gregeroszlar, you're headed for a permanent block if you continue to post your promotional content. This action is also forbidden on editors' talk pages. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 19:36, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 19:49, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked

Per this, as your intent is to further disrupt Wikipedia with self-promotion, I have extended this block to an indefinite one. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:58, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Kinu:, given this, would you consider removing talk page access too? Many thanks, The Mirror Cracked (talk) 20:22, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:27, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.