User talk:Gregpolk

Welcome!

Hello, Gregpolk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 02:24, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jean-Michel Basquiat. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Twixister (talk) 05:08, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) An edit that places facts about and consolidates his personal life information is not unconstructive or vandalism.

It is unconstructive when it's not properly cited. You make repetitive edits without an explanation which are poorly cited even after being notified, that constitutes as vandalism. I've going to nominate the Jean-Michel Basquiat article to become a good article and your citations not sufficient. Please make a new section on the article's talk page before adding completely new sections, so other editors can weigh in as well. Most of Basquiat's relationships were with women, some who were notable in his life and they're mentioned in the article. I've added his involvement with Klaus Nomi and how he allegedly worked as a male prostitute as a teenager. Creating a personal life sub-section just so you can write an analysis about his brief relationship with Klaus Nomi is not constructive. Rumors about his personal life is not his legacy which is the section you keep editing. You seem to be trying to promote the book "The Professor: Witnessing White Power" by Rob Redding and you don't even cite the pages. A website mentioning the book isn't sufficient. Basquiat's various relationships and drug addiction are part of his personal life and that information is intertwined into his article because they coincide with his career. Basquiat was never married and didn't have any children, so a personal life section isn't necessary and opens up room for gossip such as your edits.Twixister (talk) 23:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) I am not sure why your setting the bar higher for the cite than others have to meet. The boyfriends account of his involvement and his subsequent involvement with Nomi is vital. Further, your analysis of just how queer Basquiat really was reeks of homophobia. He does not have to have children to have a personal life section. Many queer people get personal life sections who don't have children. I will repost the Redding content with a page number of 16, as we disagree on this matter. Simply put, it is not vandalism to consolidate the information in a push for a more complete history of his involvement with men and women, as my edits have already made the bio more complete.

Please sign your name at the end when your post when you write on any talk page. You have been on Wikipedia for years so you should familiarize yourself with the rules. This is not about my sexual preference. I added his relationship with Klaus Nomi to the article and how he may have worked as a prostitute in his teenage years, but that is not sufficient enough for you. You are not citing properly. The standards are the same for everyone. Stating the page number in the article isn't sufficient. You even misspell Basquiat's name with your edits. A person does not need to be married or have children to have a personal life section, but in some cases like with Basquiat, his personal life coincides with his career and it's all in the biography. You don't mention his many public relationships with women in your personal life section, only Suzanne because it supports what you want to post about his bisexuality. You simply want to emphasize a fling that neither party ever publicly talked about. Redding's opinion on how important he believed Basquiat's relationship with Klaus Nomi is not vital. Klaus Nomi was not the first or last white person Basquiat was involved in. Please begin a new topic in Talk:Jean-Michel Basquiat with this information that you keep adding so that other editors can weigh in because I don't think your edits are constructive to his article.Twixister (talk) 17:31, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jean-Michel Basquiat. Twixister (talk) 17:43, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) A misspelling does no mean that I am not right to add a personal section. Redding's book speaks about his entire relationship with a black gay man, your analysis does not deal with that. This is why I am citing Redding. I will ask for a compromise to settle this. What if we abandon the personal life section and add a line about Pierre Francillon and his claim of being an early boyfriend to the artist? Again, I am citing Redding because he is the only person who has the full story.

Here is more information on Pierre Francillon Here is his picture with Basquiat: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10154331430433420&set=ecnf.571288419 Here is an article about how close they were: https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/ny-bicyclist-assault-brooklyn-baseball-bat-pierre-francillon-20210222-y633ttn3kzge3huf7y745dxxxy-story.html

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rob Redding, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Huntington. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rob Redding for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rob Redding is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Redding (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

wizzito | say hello! 15:24, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I am not sure why this page is a problem. The last one was deleted because it had problems. This one relies on reliable sources. I don't think we need to be marginalizing bisexual people of color. Gregpolk (talk) 23:02, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You should also read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_bias_on_Wikipedia Gregpolk (talk) 23:37, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Redding News Review for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Redding News Review is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redding News Review until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

wizzito | say hello! 15:27, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My argument is the same here. This website is linked to and mentioned in the Washington Post, NPR....I am not sure why this man or his web site are being targeted? Gregpolk (talk) 23:05, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_bias_on_Wikipedia Gregpolk (talk) 23:37, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, Gregpolk. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. wizzito | say hello! 03:03, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. none of what I have done is racist. I simply noticed a recreation of an article that was previously deleted (luckily there is probably notability for Redding). You are a single-purpose account who has made little edits outside this topic, and possibly have a conflict of interest. I suggest that you follow these guidelines (I forgot to give them to you the first time) wizzito | say hello! 03:07, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You clearly didn't read my profile. Gregpolk (talk) 23:43, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Timothy french

Hello, Gregpolk, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Timothy french, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy french.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Josey Wales^Parley 21:43, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. I have added my thoughts to the talk page, as I think they should be included in WIKI. Gregpolk (talk) 20:24, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Children'sRescueFund (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by I dream of horses were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sourced by press releases.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Children'sRescueFund and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 18:49, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will withdraw the article from consideration. Gregpolk (talk) 20:21, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gregpolk! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 18:49, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will withdraw the article. Gregpolk (talk) 20:20, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Children'sRescueFund

Hello, Gregpolk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Children'sRescueFund, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consciousness Magazine moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Consciousness Magazine. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 07:11, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Consciousness Magazine (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CoconutOctopus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Consciousness Magazine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CoconutOctopus talk 17:05, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]