Jump to content

User talk:GrgXbis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reliable sources

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Tgeorgescu (talk) 07:10, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Partial block

[edit]

You have been blocked from editing Shroud of Turin and Fringe theories about the Shroud of Turin for a month because of your persistent edit warring and pushing of a tendentious pro-fringe viewpoint. Please note that you can still edit the talkpages of these articles — something that you have never done, despite being urged to.[1] Discussion is better than trying to force your version into the article. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | tålk 15:48, 13 April 2021 (UTC).[reply]