User talk:Grobelnik
|
You have recently re-created the article Dunja Mladenic, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. 23:42, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Dunja Mladenic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, article #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Additionally, when you place the {{hangon}} tag in the article, you need to explain why the person should have an article on wikipedia on the talk page for the article. see the link in the hangon notice. I will be restoring both the speedy tag and the hangon notice. --Trödel 00:32, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Conflict of Interest
[edit]Your article on yourself, Marko Grobelnik, has been listed as a candidate for deletion due to apparent conflict of interest. In future, consider not creating and writing articles about yourself. --BlueSquadronRaven 22:58, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Answering
[edit]Hi, I have answered on my talkpage. Please read the policies and guidelines I and others have provided; I will now also provide you with a welcome message with even more policies and guidelines to read. Thank you. --Dirk Beetstra T C 12:45, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
The file File:MarkoGrobelnik6.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
The file File:DunjaMladenic9.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
orphaned image, absent user, no encyclopedic use, likely used in speedy deleted article per user talk page
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
