User talk:Guddubhaia121

November 2019

Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tomar clan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. utcursch | talk 15:02, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tomar clan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. utcursch | talk 15:35, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tomar clan

Okie ,I'll Guddubhaia121 (talk) 18:12, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Guddubhaia121, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Gurjar does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 10:06, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

—SpacemanSpiff 02:35, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, I'm Alivardi. I noticed that you recently removed content from Prithviraj Chauhan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Alivardi (talk) 12:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have got source where we can see that the rajputs were present at the time of prithviraj chauhan, and he himself was one.. Guddubhaia121 (talk) 14:19, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The source you are citing, The Last Hindu Emperor: Prithviraj Chauhan and the Indian Past 1200-2000 by Cynthia Talbot, does not say this. See this quote from page 33 of that text: "The leading martial lineages of the eleventh and twelfth centuries were classified in later times as aristocratic Rajput clans, an identity that did not yet exist in the lifetime of Prithviraj Chauhan."
Alivardi (talk) 15:45, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Prithviraj Chauhan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Chariotrider555 (talk) 02:32, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I even provided the source of that removal. Guddubhaia121 (talk) 03:06, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alert for India/Pakistan/Afghanistan related articles

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Vengeance 01 (talk) 15:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note - I'm leaving this alert on multiple other editors to make sure everyone is aware that editor behavior is closely watched on these articles. Vengeance 01 (talk) 15:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]