User talk:Gurvinder09

Welcome!

Hello, Gurvinder09, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Raitis Stalazs, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! reddogsix (talk) 19:13, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Hajipurwadi Map.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hajipurwadi Map.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 12:19, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gurvinder. I noticed your comment, "This image is a screenshot from Google Map and i cropped it using Photoshop so it don't have any copyrights." Unfortunately, this is not a correct statement. What you have created is known as a derivative work (follow link to the FAQ for more information), and it is indeed an infringement of Google's copyright in the original work.
By the way, I also noticed that the link in your signature which should lead to this talk page is not working. User talk:UserGurvinder09 should be User talk:Gurvinder09. Then, I would not recommend hard-coding the word "Talk" to appear in red. Once you have fixed this link and it is working, I don't think you will want it to look like a red link. Thanks! – Wdchk (talk) 15:49, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 19:35, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gurvinder09 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How my account can be block when i even dont know the other users. I just edit pages by searching for them on New articles by topic. I even dont have any other account on wikipedia. Gurvinder | Talk 19:40, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So we're supposed to believe it's entirely a coincidence that you wrote an article about an utterly non-notable author whom you claim to have photographed personally while the other account liked to this one wrote about that author's self-published, equally non-notable book? I don't think so. Huon (talk) 19:49, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser sez Confirmed, meaning that the personally-identifying technical information that CheckUsers have access to (and will thus not openly discuss on-wiki) virtually matches that of Mr.sahota. Such CheckUser results generally are incontestible. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 01:51, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is ridiculous Now who is this Mr.Sahota and why you guys are relating me with him/her? and i need the Checkuser report where i can see my compression with other user and want to know on what behalf they blocked me. Gurvinder | Talk 04:49, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mr.sahota is the sockmaster behind your account. And again, CUs will not reveal the inner workings of the CheckUser tool on-wiki due to privacy implications. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 05:11, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But i dont know about Mr.Sahota as this is the shared computer at my office where i use wikipedia in my free time. Gurvinder | Talk 06:06, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]