User talk:Hamza974

Draft:Contemporary Jurisprudence[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your edits! I removed a citation from Draft:Contemporary Jurisprudence. In general, Wikipedia should not cite itself, as this can cause verifiability issues. I recommend taking a look at WP:NOTSOURCE for further information. Thanks, and again, welcome! Thriftycat ^{Talk • Contribs} 13:13, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Contemporary Jurisprudence (December 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This still turns on a single source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Contemporary Jurisprudence and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 17:52, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hamza974! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 17:52, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Teahouse for your reply and thanks for giving me a way to further investigate the rejection reason. Hamza974 (talk) 14:34, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 14:24, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable sources[edit]

Thank you for contributing to the article Horse breed. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 09:17, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]