Hello, Han2007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Hello, I'm TheOldJacobite. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Batman (1989 film) that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Old JacobiteThe '4516:00, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What you're editing are Good Articles, and your additions are not deemed helpful by other editors. You may discuss such matters on the talk page, but it is rarely a good idea to go against consensus. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:03, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Batman (1989 film). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
And now you are being willfully disruptive at Mastermind (Jason Wyngarde). Bluntly: Your opinion or interpretation of the films is not a reason to add the material. A reliable, verifiable, secondary source, and preferable a third party one is needed to support that information.
If you continue to disrupt the article, re-add that information without an appropriate source, or engage in disruptive actions based on what you want in the article, you will be temporarily blocked from editing.
What you did is a disruptive creation of an improper content fork. Please refrain from doing this again.
Similarly, please do not revert redirects to plot only, fanservice character articles and you did here.
And while were at it:
Changes like this need to be explained. Where is that name used? Is it how the character commonly identified?
Removing matenace tags, as you did here, without actually addressing the issue is incorrect. Once or twice is disruptive, continuing to do this can be seen as vandalism.
Common words and phrases generally should not be linked as you did here. Please read WP:OVERLINK
And you are going to need to show a consensus to get this change.
Coming off of a block for disrupting articles with your own interpretations and removing maintenance tags without addressing the problems and doing the exact same things - [5] & [6] - is a good way to get yourself re-blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Sorry for threat JGreb but are watching his editions, this guy is making my life impossible here in wikipedia and not allow me to contribute to it. Although my unlocking is not for tomorrow yet I ask that this person be investigated for his constant abuse. I know this does not presume in good faith but not the presumed JGreb for his constant attacks on my person. Sorry if I had to get death threats and was told that in a moment of anger, but this person can not do what he pleases in wikipedia and even being administrator must set a good example. And I will not create sockpuppets (what a lie) and if they do other users and even administrators, only emergency I can create another user without having to do more.
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I was angry, I'm sorry. Why don't give me a second chance?. Jpgordon please be reasonable and the other decent administrators; J Greb is a worse user than me but that's not justify my actions with him, so I'm sorry for this. Give a secind chance and I swear don't not therat J Greb and/or other administrator but please review the actions of J Greb.
Decline reason:
No. You still claim that you were reasonable and J. Greb was not. First of all, J. Greb's actions and comments are above the board here. Second, even if they weren't, there is no excuse for what you said (I'm shocked that someone would talk like that). This is not a game. This is not some forum where teenagers can go around calling each other names. You have a lot of growing up to do before you can write an unblock request that an admin here will accept; obviously this one is not going to be granted. Drmies (talk) 03:32, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
There is a clear history of anger management issues here. If you've chosen to escalate to specific threats of bodily harm, you are indeed utterly unwelcome to contribute. At that, I don't see any reason to continue to allow you to post passive-aggressive unblock requests; please use WP:BASC. Kuru(talk)03:36, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm TheOldJacobite. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Batman (1989 film) that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Old JacobiteThe '45 16:00, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
