User talk:Hanshifu+62

August 2022

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. MrOllie (talk) 02:49, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I beg your pardon, Sir: (1)The common sense MATH facts there could be checked by everybody from all over the world now (not just subjective personal opinions). (2)Those are very-very constructive and good for Wiki. The MATH facts there are reliable and proven: (2a)The econometric formulas known are >6,666 but average econometric book just listed 240, (2b)The time value of money formulas are >69, but average book are just mentioned 15- in Wiki are just 11. (2c)Amazon had published those 6,666 econometric & 69 time value books. (3)It takes hundreds of years for the same proven known MATH facts that could be listed & checked now, to be published by rigid formal institutions. (4)This could be bad for Wiki's leadership in econometric & investment, against its stronger competitor specialists: Investopedia, Corporate finance institute & IMF. (5)Thanks. Hanshifu+62 (talk) 03:53, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mathematical Finance

Hi. I have reverted your edit on mathematical finance. I am unclear as to why you view "mathematical finance" and "financial mathematics" as separate subjects. Citations would be needed to backup such a change. Zfeinst (talk) 14:54, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(I):Unfortunately the burden of logic (not just citation) is not on my side, Sir: Professor, are you honestly believe that MATHFIN=FINMATH ???

1)Most of the people -except very few mathematician- think that MathFin is different than FinMath, as Production House >< House Production, Business Computer >< Computer Business, House Dog >< Dog House, etc. 2)By Common Law, MathFin [not FinMath] are Finance guy, punishable if not following the non-mathematical social consensus "IFRS, GAAP, Basel, Lex-US, Lex-Euro, Dual Entry, Accrual, Deferral, CAR, LDR, LLL, Depreciation, Tax, Deductibles, etc". 3)MathFin [not FinMath] is very-very important in actual real business' computer programming!! 4)So please the minority give proof to the majority that MathFin=FinMath !!!, 5)Thanks. Hanshifu+62 (talk) 19:43, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(II):Please solve the most common legal MATHFIN [not FinMath] case, non numerical Pacioli's "geometria" & "proportionalita" (I'll tell you the answer, if you could not solve):

"State the financial proforma (Balance-sheet & Income Statement at IFRS-GAAP standard) to be signed by Owners & CEO+CFO in the Annual Shareholders Meeting, with the known Last Year's Revenue and this year's Revenue, Variable Cost, Interest Expense, Before Tax Income, After Tax Income, Net Dividend, Retained Earnings, Total Assets, Capital, Long-term Debt, Account Payable, Kind of Cash, Inventory and Account Receivable, at legal Income & Dividend Tax Rate with 5% improvements of all driving ratios (Sales Growth, Variable Portion, Fixed Portion, Interest Portion, Dividend Payout, Leverage, Days Payable, Days Receivable, Days Inventory, Current Ratio & Quick Ratio)." Hanshifu+62 (talk) 21:09, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(III}:Also another common non numerical MATHFIN [not FinMath] case of 3 companies merger, "summa arithmetica, geometria, proportioni & proportionalita", not just easier than the case before, but also easier than 4 companies acquisition (I explain you the solution, if you could not tell them):

"In case of 3 different companies merger: F, G, H (i.e Fedex, General Motors & Hilton), please give the 30 finance ratio formulas after merger: 01)Asset to debt, 02)Debt to capital, 03)Capital to revenue, 04)Revenue to expense, 05)Expense to earnings, 06)Earnings to asset, 07)Asset to capital, 08)Debt to revenue, 09)Capital to expense, 10)Revenue to earnings, 11)Expense to asset, 12)Earnings to debt, 13)Asset to revenue, 14)Debt to expense, 15)Capital to earnings, 16)Revenue to asset, 17)Expense to debt, 18)Earnings to capital, 19)Asset to expense, 20)Debt to earnings, 21)Capital to asset, 22)Revenue to debt, 23)Expense to capital, 24)Earnings to revenue, 25)Asset to earnings, 26)Debt to asset, 27)Capital to debt, 28)Revenue to capital, 29)Expense to revenue and 30)Earnings to expense." Hanshifu+62 (talk) 02:09, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(IV)Please solve the banker's daily MATHFIN [not FinMath] non numerical Financing, "Smith" vs "Cobb-Douglas" (I could explain you the answer, if you do not know how to do it):

"1)How much money needed to financing the optimum business if given the time series data of Quantity, Price and Total Cost? 2)How big is the optimum total sales? 3)How much its total cost? 4)How big its total profit? 5)What is its selling price per unit? 6)Cost per unit? 7)Profit per unit? 8)How many unit sold at its optimum? 9)What is its average variable cost? 10)Its average fixed cost?, 11)Its total variable cost?, 12)Its total fix cost? 13)Where is its shut-down point? Also explain the differences if the company is 'dominant' or in a 'competitive' free market?" Hanshifu+62 (talk) 04:47, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 11:34, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Steve Asikin

Hello, why were you editing another user's WP:user page? That's a bit unusual. Best. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:42, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am just trying to help it from deletion Hanshifu+62 (talk) 11:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]