User talk:HappenedAnd88

Getting started!

HappenedAnd88, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi HappenedAnd88! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. —RainFall 05:09, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'm trying to get better at using them when they apply.HappenedAnd88 (talk) 05:12, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 16:12, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bishonen, this is just another variety of User:OnceASpy, who wasn't here on Wikipedia to improve the project in the first place. Drmies (talk) 16:12, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HappenedAnd88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm confused. I haven't done anything to warrant a block. I'm being accused of being another blocked editor but this is my only account. HappenedAnd88 (talk) 16:29, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So sorry. I cannot unblock you at this time. There is compelling evidence of sockpuppetry and this is a check user block. Please carefully read the pertinent sections of the GAB for more information on appealing this block. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:41, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HappenedAnd88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've been blocked. Accused of being someone else. And my unblock request was denied with a very confusing reason. Can I get an explanation?

Decline reason:

Confirmed to OnceASpy (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) and the sleeper account KandiLynn1993 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). Given Bishonen's note in the block log that the next block should be indefinite, I'm converting the block on your main account to an indefinite CheckUser block. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:31, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

HappenedAnd88 (talk) 17:44, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry you are confused. Please read the relevant parts of the WP:guide to appealing blocks for greater clarity.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:46, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to see the evidence. This is an unwarranted block and I'd like a fair shake at appealing this. Thank you HappenedAnd88 (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]