User talk:Harimia

May 2024

Hello, I'm CpX41. I noticed that you recently removed content from Reciprocal Access Agreement without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CpX41 (talk) 09:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Remsense诉 11:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chinese culture. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Remsense诉 11:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Taiwan,Hong Kong and Macau, Singapore are also be in Chinese Culture. I am not familiar with the Policies though, I do not edit disruptly. Harimia (talk) 11:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Indians in Korea, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Remsense诉 10:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Remsense诉 06:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Indians in Korea

added a link pointing to Hwaseong

Kim Ku

added a link pointing to South Korean

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore uses Simplified Chinese as its official written form of the language

So please stop changing official titles from simplified to traditional characters ([1]) or adding traditional Chinese into fields meant for official languages ([2]). Doesn't matter if you think traditional Chinese is "widespreadly used", that still doesn't make it any more official than other unofficial languages like Singlish or Hokkien. Bennv123 (talk) 01:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indians in Korea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hwaseong.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Alex Van Halen, you may be blocked from editing without further warnings. Thank you,

Didn't see the message you moved

please see MOS:ETHNICITY for why "Dutch-American" or "Dutch-born American" is not used here - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 14:09, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of modern great powers. You have never attempted to engage in discussion on a talk page to justify your additions or changes, and coming back months later in order to readd the same content contested by others—in many cases great quantities of content—is not behavior we need on Wikipedia. You need to start engaging in consensus-building with your fellow editors, or you won't be here for much longer. Remsense ‥ 论 04:26, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Remsense ‥ 论 05:54, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Fred Rogers, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Graham87 (talk) 16:06, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We generally use the original title of works in situations like this. I have reverted many of your other recent edits, for reasons described in the page histories of each article. Per the content and substandard English of your first and almost only edit summary here (along with the comments in the admins' noticeboard discussion about you), you should focus your attention on the Korean Wikipedia rather than this site. If you continue your disruptive editing pattern, you may be blocked. Graham87 (talk) 16:06, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 (talk) 05:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have continued your disruptive editing pattern, not only under this account but also as 155.230.85.37 (per similar edits at Daniel Tiger's Neighborhood). Graham87 (talk) 05:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Along with other IP's. Graham87 (talk) 07:41, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is true that I have positive intentions and put information in the text. I swear that I do not disrupt and vandalise the document. Harimia (talk) 15:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Harimia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I usually want to put more information that some one don't know and have no intention to disrupt. I think the blocking my account with undefined duration is so unreasonable. I havw followed the rules of Wikipedia and put the link that have more information. So I request you to solve my blocking. I always have good intentions to put reasonable and positive information that is true

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Harimia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

abuse of editing privileges (disrupt editing). I understand why I blocked. Although I have good intentions to put information I think it is so appropriate, I could not follow the rule that I need to add sources and do not overlink. I will not make disrupted editing instead I will make positive editing that is so useful. I will not disrupt Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Your English skill does not seem sufficient to participate here. I would encourage you to edit the Wikipedia of a language with which you are more familiar(maybe Korean?). 331dot (talk) 17:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.