User talk:Harrego
|
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:41, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Salina, Colorado
[edit]I gave feedback a couple of days ago, about writing a Wikipedia article, and stated that all the requirements for referencing, verifying, footnoting, etc. were very confusing and I wished I had never tried to contribute to begin with! You wrote me stating that all of this was confusing at first but I'd get the hang of it...and referred me to a link for an "example" of what to do. (I couldn't view the video you recommended because my computer has limited memory, dial up moden and is so slow that I cannot view videos.) I went to that link and things were no more clear to me afterward than before. My page, "Salina, Colorado" has boxes stating that my article does not have Inline Citations, it has not been Wikified, and is not Catagorized. I've spent hours trying to understand all of this, but it's no use. You have to be a college graduate and under 35 years old to comprehend this stuff! At age 66 I am not going to knock myself out trying to comply to all the crap Wiki requires from a contributor. My opinion still stands. I wish I had never signed up for Wikipedia to beging with!! Razzman45 (talk) 19:53, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Mr. Rasmussen