User talk:Harry Tudor

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Harry Tudor! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 21:05, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

António Dias da Cunha

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: António Dias da Cunha. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet of user:G.-M. Cupertino

See User talk:Konakonian -- PBS (talk) 12:05, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See also User talk:Mamikonian where checkuser confirmed that this account was one and the same with User:LoveActresses and a sockpuppet of User:G.-M. Cupertino --PBS (talk) 21:44, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of G.-M. Cupertino (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TN X Man 23:04, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Harry Tudor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm former User:Mamikonian. It's the second time I get blocked by no apparent or at least solid reason. I was working without any trouble until I made some edits on English articles and I got blocked. Now I was going fine once again until I started getting some troubles acceeding a few days ago because apparently someone else had used the same public computer I'm using, someone I was accused of being the first time around. Now someone blocked me again. What's going on? How can I avoid these troubles? How can I edit without being harrassed in this manner? Isn't there a mechanism for people to be allowed to edit with their accounts despite the IP blocking or with its use by someone else entirely different? Thank you. Whoever the other user is, he or she's causing too many troubles to third parties, more than the case deserves.

Decline reason:

User:Mamikonian is blocked indefinitely. I don't see anything removing this block or permitting you to edit while the block is in place; if you wish to point us to such a thing, please do. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 18:02, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Harry Tudor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That's what I'm trying to explain, I was blocked twice without any other reason than an IP issue, with the accusation of being another editor. And above that they even authoritarily blocked my access to the talk page. For that reason I request both to be unblocked.

Decline reason:

Admitting you created an account to circumvent a block is not a reason to unblock you, quite the opposite. I suggest you appeal your case to the Ban Appeals Subcommittee for a thorough investigation. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:02, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of António Lino de Sousa Horta Osório

The article António Lino de Sousa Horta Osório has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nswix (talk) 22:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Agricultural Entrepreneur" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Agricultural Entrepreneur has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 8 § Agricultural Entrepreneur until a consensus is reached. 192.76.8.84 (talk) 14:40, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Farm Entrepreneur" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Farm Entrepreneur has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 8 § Farm Entrepreneur until a consensus is reached. 192.76.8.84 (talk) 14:49, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]