User talk:Harun Zaria
I want to introduce my vice Chancellor in the Wikipedia[edit]
How can I start? May I use talk page? Harun Zaria (talk) 10:43, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Welcome Harun Zaria!
I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| To help get you started, you may find these useful: | When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
Hi Harun Zaria, please also read Wikipedia's notability guidelines to ensure the subject meets the criteria to warrant an article. S0091 (talk) 18:53, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Please help me to submit this draft Harun Zaria (talk) 20:23, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
An Invite to join Hausa Wikimedia Community[edit]
|
Hello! I noticed you've made edits to Hausa related articles or that you are in some way connected to Hausa. I thought you may be interested in joining Hausa Wikimedians User Group They are a group of editors working to improve Wikip(m)edia's Hausa projects coverage and topics related to Hausa people, culture etc. Please take a look and If you would be interested in joining feel free to add your name at the Members Page! |
Em-mustapha talk 11:58, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Thank you so much for inviting me Harun Zaria (talk) 04:37, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
November 2020[edit]
Hello Harun Zaria. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Harun Zaria. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Harun Zaria|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS 💬 08:55, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Good evening sir.i don't know what you mean by undisclosed paid edition on this write up, I wrote without even knowing him one month ago in my life. I wrote this Daniel Mofor based on how I read Wikipedia policy, and I have gone through how wikipedia write up become paid edition. Sir, I will like to remove some advert that may reflect paid edition. I got impression about him when saw him feature on New York Times, planio magazine, Dallas fashion design and the rest. Please help me to delete some of nature of been paid on this Daniel Mofor write up. And to err is human, there is possible violation I made for writing Daniel Mofor. Harun Zaria (talk) 09:49, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Mofor[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Daniel Mofor, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 14:45, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
November 2020[edit]
Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:
- Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
- State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
- Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.