User talk:Hasnainbv

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edits you have made to have been reverted, as they appear to be promotional, and in any event have incomplete citations that replace better sources. Please take some time to familiarize yourself with our policies and guidelines. If you wish discuss what you are trying to accomplish, please open a discussion on the appropriate article's Talk page where you see an issue. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:46, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it will be great, I have seen few companies citing for example:

Check below Citation on Glenn Close, they are direclty linking their product page isn't it advertising or something???? Wikipedia have dual standards... and my Apeal has been rejected as well WHY??????

Limited, London Theatre Direct. "Sunset Boulevard tickets, London Coliseum, London Theatre Direct". londontheatredirect.com. Retrieved July 17, 2016

So How I am able to continue my activities. Also let me How do I unblock all Hasnainbv (talk) 09:20, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need the whole url when you link to another Wikipedia article or page- this locks readers into a version of Wikipedia that they might not be using(mobile or desktop). Simply place the title of the target page in double brackets, as I've done here.

As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible for inappropriate content to get by us, this cannot justify the addition of more inappropriate content. See other stuff exists. This may seem like double standards, but it is simply the nature of a volunteer project. To be unblocked, please make a new unblock request for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 09:24, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How is that incorrect and if it is incorrect why links is still on wikipedia while my same link with better content is removed!!!!!!! Hasnainbv (talk) 09:41, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:20, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This close to blocking your account and blacklisting the domain. Tracked and please don't push it, we are not here for your personal gain. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:37, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ — billinghurst sDrewth 08:18, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hasnainbv (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock my IP to continue better citation

Decline reason:

As you have an account, focus on getting your account unblocked. Attempting to edit via IP is block evasion. While your account is blocked, you personally are blocked and may not edit under any account or IP. 331dot (talk) 13:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock | reason = my IP 192.168.0.143 is blocked kindly unblock to avoid blacklisting my domain }} [[User:Hasnainbv|Hasnainbv]] ([[User talk:Hasnainbv#top|talk]]) 10:33, 13 November 2023 (UTC) :{{unblock|reason=my IP 192.168.0.143 is blocked, I cannot continue my wor}} --[[User:Hasnainbv|Hasnainbv]] ([[User talk:Hasnainbv#top|talk]]) 10:31, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

There are many people who are doing same activity as I am you people are only pointing me Hasnainbv (talk) 12:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Forget about your IP address. You have an account. Get your account unblocked, and the autoblock will be removed at the same time. Please read the unblock appeals guide to learn how to craft an unblock request likely to be accepted. 331dot (talk) 20:34, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #81032

was declined. This was almost certainly generated by an AI chatbot and was therefore completely inappropriate and raises additional WP:CIR concerns with this user. --Yamla (talk) 12:04, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Every Reply is not AI generated, neither every citation is spammy Hasnainbv (talk) 12:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We aren't talking about every reply or every citation, we are talking about yours. --Yamla (talk) 13:00, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am talking about my citations and reply. I was citing from this area Blog areas and so as other competitor's. Yes I know I was using VPN but I am trying to fix it and there is no solution. Hasnainbv (talk) 05:15, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Check below Citation on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glenn_Close, they are direclty linking their product page isn't it advertising or something???? Wikipedia have dual standards... and my Apeal has been rejected as well WHY??????

Limited, London Theatre Direct. "Sunset Boulevard tickets, London Coliseum, London Theatre Direct". londontheatredirect.com. Retrieved July 17, 2016. Hasnainbv (talk) 12:11, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #81208 is closed.

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. This requires greater discussion than is possible via UTRS. Please concisely and clearly describe how your editing merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hasnainbv (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have thoroughly review wikipedia's policies and block guide, and I now have a better understanding of community as well. I am committed with these guidelines and will ensure my contibution will align with the wiki principles. Kindly unblock my account so that I can continue contributing to wikipedia resposibly. I have taken the time to review Wikipedia's policies and guidelines thoroughly, and I now have a better understanding of the community's expectations. I am committed to adhering to these guidelines moving forward and ensuring that my contributions align with Wikipedia's principles. I have learned from this experience and will make effort to contribute positively with wiki standards. Hasnainbv (talk) 13:38, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have still not addressed with specifics that you understand why you were blocked, or what you would do differently from that going forward. If you want it to be considered at all, your unblock request will need to include specific details about those things, not just platitudes. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:26, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hasnainbv (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you for me talk on this page. I Have been blocked for promoting or advertising purpose on wikipedia. I was citing from Leicester Square Box Office News section, because we gather news from Official London Theatre Source and a member of SOLT UK. Mostly our news are related to upcoming shows and cast.For example: Which celebertay will have grammy awards and why he or she is popular on certain shows. Which is suitable for citing. There may be any incorrect citation which I don't mind to remove if I account is reactivated. Hasnainbv (talk) 06:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"we gather", "our news"... if you edit, you edit on your own account, not as a mouthpiece for your employer. Cabayi (talk) 07:48, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.