User talk:Hassocks5489/Archives/2021/February
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
DYK for Weybridge United Reformed Church
On 26 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Weybridge United Reformed Church, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that places of worship in Elmbridge, Surrey, include the "ferocious" Weybridge United Reformed Church? You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Weybridge United Reformed Church), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Content Creativity Barnstar | |
Thank you for a great article on Weybridge United Reformed Church. I especially love the hilarious quote from that fool Pevsner. Keep up the good work! Storye book (talk) 12:48, 26 January 2021 (UTC) |
@Storye book: Good to hear from you! Many thanks; glad you enjoyed it. There should be plenty more to come in due course: I have been compiling a full list of potential sources for Sussex and Surrey chapels with a view to working out which ones have enough info to justify standalone articles. Surprisingly many, as it turns out! No doubt some more Pevsner fun will feature. Cheers, Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 21:38, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, Pevsner's ignorance of the value of Victorian architecture is my bete noir - and so is the institutionalised slavery to his works. National Heritage seem to feel uncomfortable about listing a building which is not in Pevsner (sigh). And when photographing churches, you still come across people who grumpily point out their "Victorian monstrosity" pulpit or font or whatever. The more I study Victorian architecture and its carving, the more I appreciate the depth and breadth of it. So power to you. The Victorian clergy can be fun too, can't they. I have found a couple of saints and a couple of baddies (sort of) so far - all good. Couldn't do it without Crockfords and the 19th-century newspapers, though. Storye book (talk) 11:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
DYK Dorking
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d6/Dorking_Cockerel_August_2012.jpg/150px-Dorking_Cockerel_August_2012.jpg)
Hi @Hassocks5489: another user has found a better photo of the Dorking Cockerel statue and has added it to the article. I am not sure how this affects the DYK nomination, which is still live here: Template:Did you know nominations/Dorking. Would it be possible for you to check that the photo is OK and perhaps to add a comment saying so to the DYK nomination please? Thanks Mertbiol (talk) 13:56, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- I have now cropped the photo so that the statue fills the picture more - I hope this is OK with the license. Mertbiol (talk) 14:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)