User talk:HecltoTrmel2020

This is HecltoTrmel2020's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: South Loughton Cricket Club (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tagishsimon was:

You could do with more references to make the case for WP:N. Main fault with this article is that it is littered with inline external links. Per WP:EL these are not acceptable and must be removed. WP:EL gives full guidance on the use of external links.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:South Loughton Cricket Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:South Loughton Cricket Club, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tagishsimon (talk) 14:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HecltoTrmel2020! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tagishsimon (talk) 14:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: South Loughton Cricket Club (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul Carpenter was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The topic does seem to be notable enough but the controversy section is still really problematic. 'ousted' is a really loaded term, and there's still external links there. I'd also drop the mission statement from the lead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:South Loughton Cricket Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:South Loughton Cricket Club, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul ❬talk❭ 07:48, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paul, thanks for feedback. Hopefully this round of amends will get us to, or very close to, the finishing line.

HecltoTrmel2020 (talk) 15:15, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: South Loughton Cricket Club (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eyebeller were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Some claims still need sourcing, for example: "The club was originally founded as Stannox Cricket Club, changing its name to South Loughto in 1952. The origin of the name 'Stannox' is unknown. Anecdotally, one of the club's founders, the late John Forbes, believed it may have been inspired by watching a game involving a club named Lennox."

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:South Loughton Cricket Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:South Loughton Cricket Club, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eyebeller 15:26, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: South Loughton Cricket Club (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eyebeller was:

YouTube is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:South Loughton Cricket Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:South Loughton Cricket Club, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eyebeller 16:57, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: South Loughton Cricket Club has been accepted

South Loughton Cricket Club, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eyebeller 18:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of South Loughton Cricket Club for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article South Loughton Cricket Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Loughton Cricket Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Barkeep49 (talk) 16:42, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HecltoTrmel2020 (talk) 10:14, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am the author of this submission. Although I am a writer by profession, this is the first article I have attempted for Wikipedia and I have plenty to learn. In researching the suitability of this submission, I reviewed other entries for English cricket clubs. I would certainly place South Loughton Cricket Club alongside others with entries in terms of notability. The club is prominent within the county of Essex. I also attempted to adopt a similar tone and scope of content to those entries that, rather than simply list personnel past and present, or trophies won, had attempted to give a historical overview and provide context in terms of the club's current activities. The club in question has published two editions of its history (for its 50th and 75th anniversaries) but neither book carries an ISBN number (the latter is still available on Amazon) so I did not refer to them - I can do if you feel this would be appropriate. In terms of using external references to establish notability, those cited are inevitably local rather than regional/national. The club has received coverage in both national magazines and newspapers in the past but these are either not online or, in the case of The Times, behind a paywall. Finally, the feedback provided by the editors as I developed this submission was very helpful in trying to establish a neutral and encyclopaedic tone; I am puzzled by the reference to self-promotion/spam as I was confident that any remaining peacock terms had been removed. In requesting that this article remains on the site, I would add that I am very happy to do whatever remedial work you feel is necessary, or for your community to do this. Initial feedback to the article when I shared the link was very positive and I suspect others may seek to develop more entries for cricket clubs, this expanding the depth of coverage of this important sector of English cricket. Kind regards, Andrew

HecltoTrmel2020 (talk) 10:14, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HecltoTrmel2020 (talk) 09:37, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, as the author of this article, please can you explain why, when no-one has supported the proposal for deletion, the decision is to go ahead with deletion rather than reinstatement. Having worked with your initial reviewers to make the piece compliant, you graded the piece as C. Per my comment above, you haven't explained the rationale for deletion nor what can be done to make the piece meet what are clearly additional compliance requirements. Why were these not fully flagged during the submission process? I am very happy to make changes as required. While I respect your right to make decisions regarding deletion, there has to be greater transparency in this process. Thank you.

HecltoTrmel2020 (talk) 09:37, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

D3O

Hi, I've noticed that the orthography of the company name has been changed incorrectly, presumably automatically. I can't edit it back.

The company name is D 3 capital letter O, not D30 or D subscript3 O.

The subject title and one of the section headings need to be corrected.

Also the redirect seems to be from D3O to D30.

I hope it will be possible to make these corrections.

Thanks

HecltoTrmel2020 (talk) 08:44, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Institute of Event Management (January 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Institute of Event Management and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:25, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Institute of Event Management

Hello, HecltoTrmel2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Institute of Event Management, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]