User talk:Hectorhector

Hector's Talk Page

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hectorhector (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

See below

Decline reason:

Yes, you have made some good edits. But then you ruined it by doing that stupid Colbert thing, vandalising another editor's userpage, being incivil on the user's talkpage and, having been given small blocks, waiting for them to expire in order to vandalise again immediately. This is the quick route to exhausting the Wikipedia community's patience and you took it. You have given no assurance that you will change back into a productive editor. Yes, people here do take Wikipedia seriously. If you do not, then it's better for everybody if you don't come here any more. --➨ ЯEDVERS 12:43, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear Hector. Stop trolling on Elephant. Thank you. --James 17:37, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think this is clever? Dozens of other people have already tried to add the exact same thing to this and other related elephant articles. It's not funny anymore, it's just stupid. The joke is on all of the mindless drones who are going out and doing the same thing over and over merely because Dr. Colbert suggested it. --Cyde↔Weys 17:38, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits at elephant. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. Nunh-huh 17:42, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User:Cyde, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Big top 19:36, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires.

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test of deliberately adding incorrect information worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Big top 19:24, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It has become apparent that your account is only being used for vandalism, and so has been blocked indefinitely.

-- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 19:24, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is not true! I have made several usefull contributions to wikipedia. I am requesting an unblock. Hectorhector 19:44, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:LightningReactionShock.jpg

The file File:LightningReactionShock.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]