User talk:Hellohellohello890

February 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm M Imtiaz. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mouni Roy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 10:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 12:32, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Krishna Mukherjee, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Krishna Mukherjee was changed by Hellohellohello890 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.859154 on 2021-02-07T14:18:40+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hellohellohello890, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Hellohellohello890! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Aly Goni. Serols (talk) 15:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Aly Goni. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Fuzheado | Talk 15:50, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. here you add unsourced summaries. Further, the content violates our neutral point of view policy. Lastly, stop marking your edits as minor. Minor edits are ones that could not possibly be the subject of dispute, so that would be cosmetic changes like typographical/grammar/spelling/punctuation fixes. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits, most recently here, where you again add unsourced opinions that also don't adhere to our neutral point of view policy. Wikipedia is not a forum for promotion, or a fan website, it is an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:36, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS decline

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. ( Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "

 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you for your attention to these matters. Please see UTRS appeal #41167

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:28, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hellohellohello890: re: this statement in your unblock request I am aware about the neutral point of view policy of wikipedia and the information added by me was absolutely true however the mistake was that there was no source to it so as a result I got mistakened to be making disruptive edits you apparently aren't actually aware of the policy, since even if sourced "superhit" or "immense appreciation and love" wouldn't be proper encyclopedic tone as we see here (superhit and immense appreciation and love) and here (superhit). Wikipedia is not a trade rag. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:36, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing my appeal for unblock. You asked for more details regarding the unblock, so here it is. I edited the reception section of naagin series by mentioning about the online ratings received by the series. The content added by me was true about the series, however it was unsourced and henceforth I was mistakened to be making disruptive edits and blocked for an indefinite period of time. I apologise for the few unencyclopedic words used as well i will definitely take care of that. Thereby, I request you to kindly lift this block, it has been 9 days now. Previously I have corrected the plot of different series and also the cast and I assure you that I will continue making such constructive edits on wikipedia after getting unblocked and will only add sourced information from now onwards to ensure that the content added by me is of neutral pov and not mistakened to be of personal pov. This is my second appeal to you, I hope you will understand and remove the block so that i can continue making constructive edits. Thank you Hellohellohello890 (talk) 14:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

H Hellohellohello890 (talk) 12:53, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Second appeal for unblock[edit]

Thank you for reviewing my appeal for unblock. You asked for more details regarding the unblock, so here it is. I edited the reception section of naagin series by mentioning about the online ratings received by the series. The content added by me was true about the series, however it was unsourced and did not cater to the encyclopedic dictionary of wikipedia and henceforth I was mistakened to be making disruptive edits and blocked for an indefinite period of time. Thereby, I request you to kindly lift this block. Previously I have corrected the plot of different series and also the cast and I assure you that I will continue making such constructive edits on wikipedia after getting unblocked and will only add sourced information from now onwards to ensure that the content added by me is of neutral pov and not mistakened to be of personal pov. This is my second appeal to you, I hope you will understand and remove the block so that I can continue making constructive edits. Thank you Hellohellohello890 (talk) 12:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]