User talk:Helping Hand - ForYou

This is Helping Hand - ForYou's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raizy Fried (May 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raizy Fried and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 18:47, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Helping Hand - ForYou! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 18:47, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raizy Fried (May 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

What he has written or said (interviews, etc) are not independent so cannot be used to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raizy Fried and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:13, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Raizy (given name)

Hello Helping Hand - ForYou,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Nagol0929 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Raizy (given name) for deletion, because it is unnecessary per one of the criteria at WP:G14.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nagol0929}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nagol0929 (talk) 12:56, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops ignore this sorry Nagol0929 (talk) 13:11, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Raizy (given name)

Hello Helping Hand - ForYou,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Raizy (given name) for deletion, because it is unnecessary per one of the criteria at WP:G14.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:01, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Raizy Fried for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raizy Fried is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raizy Fried until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Raizy Fried

Hello, Helping Hand - ForYou. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Raizy Fried, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:10, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeanette Coron for deletion

Hello. I wanted to notify you that I've submitted Jeanette Coron for deletion because I do not feel that available sourcing online is sufficient to establish she meets our notability criteria. This means that editors will review my rationale for deletion, review the article and available sourcing, and then voice an opinion on whether to keep or delete the article. After 7 days an uninvolved administrator will evaluate the consensus of participating editors and, if need be, delete the article. You can find the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeanette Coron. As far as I am aware you are able to participate (though I would advise reading up on how to contribute first).

While I saw you remove the notability maintenance tag and add the 2 sources from the The Globe and Mail, please understand that the reliability of a source - even listed at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - does not mean that all content from that source is both a) reliable and/or b) able to establish notability. Reliable news organizations will occasionally release material that is not subject to the same editorial standards as material that originates from themselves, such as material written as an opinion by an outside contributor. In this instance, both of the sources you have provided are clearly marked as press releases, which means they are non-independent and so cannot be used to show notability. For a source to demonstrate notability it must be reliable, unaffiliated (or independent) from the subject, and provide more than a trivial mention of the subject at hand. A failure of any three of these criteria disqualifies the source.

Regardless of the outcome of the discussion, I hope this does not dissuade you from contributing further. Any and all contributions to Wikipedia are helpful and desired. Feel free to reach out if you have any questions on my talk page. —Sirdog (talk) 03:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]