User talk:HereToHelp/Archive 8

Macintosh

Hi HTH. I pinged a reviewer regarding Macintosh today, who posted some comments at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Macintosh. If you can meet those concerns, I'll be willing to keep it. Cheers, Marskell (talk) 20:37, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

I'll work on it over the next few days.--HereToHelp 21:17, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

File:Applebarnstar.jpg		The Apple Macintosh Barnstar
		I saw you work on Macintosh. You did quite a nice job! So I created this barnstar just for you! Good job! - Ohmpandya We need to talk... ♦ contribs 01:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Also thanks for your support on one of my featured images candidates! The image can't be cropped because if you do the resolution will... well you know... - Ohmpandya ^{We need to talk... ♦ contribs} 01:24, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Ah, well we might let that slide…the same way I'll let the derivative image of Apple's logo slide…--HereToHelp 03:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

image help

hello I need help with an image.

I found a good leopad picture but whenever I post it (preview) It turns out to be a different picture.

Here check out the image that's codenamed Leopard.jpg [1]

I posted the codename here.

[[Image:Leopard.jpg|150px]]

See what I mean?

Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobisbob (talk • contribs) 21:34, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

I am having trouble re uloading the inage though. Bobisbob (talk) 00:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Big Thanks Bobisbob (talk) 01:40, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

No prob.--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 02:12, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Could you re-upload this [2] too? It has the same problem. I think it would fit good in the buttocks atricle. When I put it on the page this appears instead

Thanks again. Bobisbob (talk) 02:27, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

It's me again. How do I tell is a pic in in the public domain? I want to use one of the zebra pictures on this page. I highly doubt the person owns the photos but she could have licensed them. Can I upload one anyway and if it is copyrighted let the admins delete it? Bobisbob (talk) 20:56, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I just got the premission from the copyright holder to use this photo Do I go ahead and upload it and credit him? Bobisbob (talk) 00:45, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

orca pic

Hey I have been trying to upload this pic. It's has been used around the web for several years with no rights claimed to it. I can't find anything in the licensing slot to match it. Bobisbob (talk) 15:51, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

But the pic is in the PD. What isn't there a choice for pics that lost their copyright recently? Bobisbob (talk) 01:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Do you known how I can cut out the frame in this pic? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobisbob (talk • contribs) 20:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC) I don't know how to to the first suggestion. Bobisbob (talk) 01:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

:-)

So glad to 'see' you popping up on our watchlist now and again. Some folks are in our WP: DeeEnAye forever I guess, not that we mind, mind you (don't you just love mind mind or that that)! --hydnjo talk 06:37, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Help contents contents

A tag has been placed on Template:Help contents contents requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:36, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Imamacimapc.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Imamacimapc.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

In Re: IWoz

Please add citations for the article IWoz. See article for more details. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Thank you. InvisibleDiplomat (talk) 16:05, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Senate Guards

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Senate Guards, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Senate Guards. Terraxos (talk) 23:03, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

New MOSNUM policy to address more than just binary prefixes

Since you voted on a proposal to no longer routinely use the IEC prefixes (kibibytes & KiB), I thought you’d be interested to know that the best we could muster at this time is a more general principal here on MOSNUM. I’m sorry I couldn’t deliver anything better at the moment. However, I hope you will agree that it speaks to the basic principal underlying that whole debate. Greg L (talk) 03:41, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

A newcomer

hi.I am new in wp but i had some articles in persian wp.i creates this article about a persian actress.could you tell me how i can put a piece of conversation in it? (i know that the format should be ogg)Bbadree (talk) 20:36, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Stephanie Adams Article

Hello, there seems to be a lot of animosity and bitterness by users who have been editing the article on Stephanie Adams, even on the discussion page. Can you please step in and stop people from making personal attacks against the subject matter? This woman obviously does not know anyone of them personally and her article should no longer be edited by people who clearly have some sort of gripe against her. If they do not like her, then perhaps they should write about someone else. 71.167.226.96 (talk) 09:05, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

When considering this request from 71.167.226.96 please be aware that she has referred to other editors as "sicko", "retard", "idiot", "flunky" and peppers her contributions with "You took your hand off your little thing between your legs long enough to type" and other such comments. (Her contribution to Talk:Stephanie Adams at [3].) So, yes, there does seem to be an inappropriate amount of animosity and personal attacks from people who have some sort of gripe. But let's be clear on who is actually the source. -- Sean Martin (talk) 18:10, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

First of all, I am a "he", not a "she". Second, I never left comments like that and am starting to wonder if you are mentally all there. Sean Martin, stop obsessing over Stephanie Adams (as well as me, because you have followed all of my comments on other pages) and stop leaving personal attacks about her on her discussion page just because she sued your friend and beat him. Miss Adams does not know you and will never want to know you. End of story. 71.167.226.96 (talk) 23:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Sean's comment about incivility seems to be reflected in the anon's comments themselves. (You say that you've "never left comments like" that and then immediately accuse him of not being "mentally all there"? Remember: the first person to make a personal attack alway loses.) Considering that I am unfamiliar with the subject or debate, I will not directly intervene. Rather, I urge all of you to be civil, follow NPOV, and try to work this one out on your own. If that fails, try an RfC.--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 23:16, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

"I never left comments like that" Just follow the link I provided. If not you then someone coming thru the exact same IP address and clearly you should look much closer to home when admonishing folks to stop personal attacks. (Any confusion, if it exists, could be easily alleviated if you got a named Wiki account. Avoiding anonymity would also help credibility.) "stop leaving personal attacks about her on her discussion page" Please provide even one example. "she sued your friend and beat him" You can keep saying that, but it will remain untrue. She has threatened and harassed, but not sued any friends of mine. Assuming her suit against James Poling is what you are referring to, again, I've never met him, never spoken to him, do not know him personally, am not friends with him.

If you want me to stop posting, stop leaving postings containing falsehoods about me. I will continue to respond to any postings you or anyone makes that do. I'll stop the moment you do. Up to you. -- Sean Martin (talk) 01:06, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

This guy "Sean Martin" thinks everyone he is in contact with is Stephanie Adams because obviously he is obsessed with her. Personally I think he should be banned from editing on Wikipedia. If you take a look at his comments on the Stephanie Adams discussion page, accusing everyone of being Stephanie Adams, you will see that something is not all there. I know I have a temper and I will curb that, as Wikipedia should be a source for people that are editing objectively. But when people like him step in and insult perfect strangers, including the person in the article, they should be dealt with accordingly. Who exactly handles this and how can we get them involved? I may or may not get a chance to come back to this page, but maybe you should contact that person and have them take a look at the discussion page for the article themself. 66.108.4.133 (talk) 23:29, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

I just did, and while it looks like there's been some agitation on both sides, it's particularly difficult to figure out what anonymous comments belong to whom. Was it really the same person who posted here? What i can tell is that most of the heavier stuff comes from the anons, but that may or may not be you. So, EVERYBODY, chill down.--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 00:08, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Always have been chilled. But, as noted above, I will reply to any posting made containing falsehoods about me.

By all means, as the anonymous poster suggests, look at the discussion page and review every posting I've ever made and you won't be able to provide any example of where I've insulted anyone. Now, review the postings from 66.108.4.133 or 71.167.226.96 (or any of the other host of anonymous posters whos IPs all originate from Verizon NYC) and you may be hard pressed to find a posting that doesn't. -- Sean Martin (talk) 01:06, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Sean has offered to let the issue drop. ("I will continue to respond to any postings you or anyone makes that do. I'll stop the moment you do. Up to you.") So, anon, please do.--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 01:57, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

How do you do this?

How do you make user boxes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mickman1234 (talk • contribs) 13:44, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

im a noob here

im sorry not to be rude but i need a little more detail than the user box link :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mickman1234 (talk • contribs) 04:50, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Straw poll vote on binary prefixes

I note that you voted on a proposed MOSNUM policy for Wikipedia to use the common binary prefixes like “kilobit” rather than the IEC prefixes (“kibibit”). Since you took an interest in the issue at that time, I thought it proper to let you know that the proposal has since morphed into a broader policy (MOSNUM #Follow current literature). A straw poll on whether the basic principle underlying that policy is sound is currently ongoing here at Talk MOSNUM #Straw poll. I hope you read the policy and vote as you see fit. Hope to see you there. Greg L (talk) 21:56, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Discussion Entry

Hey, I'm kinda new (KINDA), and I was hoping you could help me. A page I had been editing is in the deletion discussion area. I was wondering if I could get your help for how to enter that discussion, I can't figure it out, and I want to contribute my opinion. (It's a Halo page, go figure).

Thanks in advance, --Alex/Wally (talk) 14:15, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ad apple 1984 5.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ad apple 1984 5.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:07, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ad apple 1984 3.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ad apple 1984 3.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:07, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ad apple 1984 4.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ad apple 1984 4.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:07, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

SVG ?

Hello, you seems good at SVG. Also, I encourage you to look at commons:user:Al2 and commons:user:LadyofHats, who both make an amazing job. I especially think that creat encyclopedic SVG schemes would be great for wikipedia article.

PS: remember you that you have a true life too, and that read a true book is great too ;) 220.135.4.212 (talk) 19:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

Smile!

I've smiled at you because you did a great job converting the PNG image. Keep up the good work HTH! MBisanz talk

Thanks! I'm tempted to convert the smiley while I'm at it :)--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 01:15, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Too bad someone beat you Image:718smiley.svg. MBisanz ^talk 03:39, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

re: deletion of History of Macintosh

Thanks for letting me know. I made the same minor edits to the main article so there shouldn't be a problem. -Classicfilms (talk) 17:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:OSMK membership badge.svg

I do appreciate your time and energy in making this image, but I am sorry, it's not even a close match to the original, the bird is not at all like the version on the national flag, the fleur-de-lis is a borrowed shape from the Scouting WikiProject and the shapes are actually unique per country, and the black outer border is unnecessary if the image is crisp enough. Perhaps you would be kind enough to try again, and show me for inspection before you change the image in the articles? Thanks so much! Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 06:19, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

When I get a chance, sure. (I could have lifted the bird from the national flag and saved all that energy trying to figure out what the heck it was supposed to look like?)--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 01:35, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! The Kazakhstan emblem is much better, but you're gonna hate me-the stars need to be equidistant, the emblem itself should be symmetrical with an equilateral border, the emblem should actually look more like the flag on the same article, the eagle is really that one, I have the badge but it is 6142 miles away. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 13:35, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes, your light green and gold are perfect, the grey band needs included. Thanks! Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 13:50, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Computer image

Just so you understand, I'm not terminally opposed to the image. I just think some of the things need fixing to make it a worthy FP. Thanks for understanding. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 21:37, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

where were you at PPR?--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 21:46, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Responding to FPC is enough work. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 21:50, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:OSMK membership badge.svg)

Thanks for uploading Image:OSMK membership badge.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:55, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Missing image Image:Personal computer, exploded 6.svg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Personal computer, exploded 6.svg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Personal computer, exploded 6.svg is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Personal computer, exploded 6.svg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 09:33, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

OS X 10.6

Why'd you remove the page? it was already announced at wwdc 2008 as snow leopard. Please get your facts right and reinstate the page. TheUnixGeek (talk) 17:53, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Change the 10.6 redirect

It should redirect to Mac OS X v10.6 not Mac OS X v10.5 as it was announced today. TheUnixGeek (talk) 17:57, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

I am not inside the keynote; so I won't accept anything until it shows up on apple.com . At the moment, nothing has. Believe me, I'm waiting.--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 18:36, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

IPHONE NANO WAS RELEASED!

WHAT DO YOU MEAN? Shutting down the rumor mill?! It was just announced a couple of seconds ago!!!! get your facts straight!!! you're not helping at all!!! TheUnixGeek (talk) 18:56, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm not inside the keynote, as you probably are. If it's not a rumor, the burden of proof rests on you.--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 19:00, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Protection of 3G iPhone

I strongly disagree with your protection of 3G iPhone. I am unsure of how it is in compliance with our protection policy? I would rather not unprotect it personally and kindly ask that you do and allow the community to reach consensus on this currently breaking event. Thanks. Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 19:20, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

I want to have time for a consensus to emerge. Besides, Apple seems to be using iPhone 3G, not 3G iPhone. I believe that having two articles will cause much of the basic information to be duplicated, causing redundancy and confusion. A "Versions" header in iPhone with subsections for 2G and 3G is more appropriate. (I will be pasting this response in other places, too.)--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 19:24, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

THe principle behind your protection seems faulty. Protection is not to prevent potential problems, it is to cease current problems. If edit warring becomes a massive problem, then it should be protected to prevent edit warring, not protected to prevent creation when there is no consensus against creation. Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 19:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Its not that I agree or disagree on any merits of having or not having separate articles. I just feel process is important (I am clearly not rogue enough, lol). Thanks for unprotecting it. Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 19:33, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Unlike UnixGeek above, I can tell you're acting in good faith, so thanks, and sorry for being a little too strict with the protections. In the interests of transparency, I suggest we continue this at Talk:IPhone#iPhone_3G.--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 19:35, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

iPhone page reorg discussion

I copied the last bits of the AfD page to a new section at Talk:iPhone. Hopefully, the discussion will resume there. I'm over my iPhone v2 excitement already. - Denimadept (talk) 20:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Given your comment on my Talk page, I've started reading Macintosh. I already made one edit. Yow. - Denimadept (talk) 20:16, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:IPhone 3G rear.png

Thanks for uploading Image:IPhone 3G rear.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

It's on there, stupid bot.--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 23:13, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:IPhone Home.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:IPhone Home.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:IPhone 3G rear.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:IPhone 3G rear.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Ultimate fate of the universe

"Millions to billions" ?? In a few million years the universe will not be noticeably different from now, and not much will happen in a few billion. "Ultimate fate" means just that...the end of things, after which the evolution of the universe ceases. Attempting to "define" ultimate by quoting some number actually leads to inevitable inaccuracy, since the timescale ranges from ~100s of billions to 10¹⁰⁰⁰ years, depending on which scenario you favour. This is so large a range that to specify it gives essentially no information, like saying "the ultimate fate of a human being is what happens between 1 yocto-second and 10⁹⁵⁷ years after birth". PaddyLeahy (talk) 16:57, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, but let's assume good faith, okay? If various theories can't pin down when it will be, then say so in the article. I made the mistake of adding those inaccurate numbers because the article (a) didn't put a specific time on it or (b) explain why doing so is not possible. Rather, you insist on complaining about it here without bothering to revert, much less fix the underlying problem with, my edit.--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 00:12, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Apologies that you took my comment the wrong way. I always AGF when dealing with admins, and I feel it is more polite to drop a note to an established editor rather than simply reverting them. However, with your permission above I'll have a go at fixing the problem. PaddyLeahy (talk) 13:44, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

No problem. You don't have to be afraid of the admins; we're given extra tools but in both in both personal and content disputes (besides obvious vandalism), a good admin will talk and discuss with the "common folk" as equals.--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 01:59, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Can U 'handle me' "Light work!"

Hope you're going on or have already gone on a good vacation! Just hung a {{clarifyme}} about this sentence in Real estate that needs someone with your legal training to sort out, should you drop in before (or after) August 9th:

"However, in some situations the term "real estate" refers to the land and fixtures together, as distinguished from "real property," referring to ownership rights of the land itself. "

• Too which I say, "Huh?" (Worse, even in context, my real estate license (stale, from two decades back) leaves me baffled on that sentence.)

Me, I'm "permanently missing" and here nearly everyday. Sigh! Nice to say hi, in any case. Have a good wiki and non-wiki holiday! // FrankB 21:11, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, but I have absolutely no legal training whatsoever. (If I seem to be an expert on copyright law, it's because I regurgitate what I've been told.) Hopefully someone else can help.--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 23:14, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Apple chess skins.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Apple chess skins.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Apple fair use

Template:Apple fair use has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 14:59, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Do you help with chemistry questions

If you help with understanding chemistry please let me know

[Removed by HTH]@yahoo.com

thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.27.235.70 (talk) 00:58, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Nope, sorry.--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 20:24, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/L'Innocence

I have removed the image from the article Good and evil, as per discussion on the FPN page. Thanks for your comments on the page itself. I see you gave the image weak/ conditional support. As requested, the artwork is now used only in the article Innocence. Jordan ^Contribs 18:27, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. It's not just me; lots of of others didn't like its usage there.--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 18:29, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

And I can see why. I have left messages on all of their talk pages notifying them of the fact, and asking for their comments. That seems the best way to go about it. Thanks again, Jordan ^Contribs 19:24, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Ramadan Pictures

Hi HereToHelp. I found some Ramadan Pictures on the net and though you may enjoy seeing them. Regards Muhammad(talk) 18:09, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Haha!

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		Awarded to IciPourAider for your humorous but totally pointless discussions on French grammar at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/L'Innocence. Thanks for making me LOL. Intothewoods29 (talk) 01:52, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Merci mille fois!--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 02:02, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Wikipedia:JEW

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Wikipedia:JEW|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Valley2city 19:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Hey, HereToHelp. I sincerely apologize. The CSD was directed not at you but at Avleet. It's hard to find the page now but here it is: definite attack page. I think twinkle automatically warned you as the creator of the redirect [4] but I semi-automatically put a warning on Avleet's page and didn't notice it was also automatically placed on your name when I created the csd. Your creation of the page is indeed the proper use of the page. It is really hard to access the redirect of WP:JEW (usually I click redirected from whatever at the top of the page but that didn't exist. Once again, I apologize and have struck out the warning for posterity. Have a great night. Valley2city 02:55, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks; no hard feelings.--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 01:19, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

iPod picture

That is a better picture of the 4th iPod Nano. Thanks. Somebody needs to find a iPod touch 2nd generation picture though.Dylpickleh8 (talk) 03:09, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Is there any way to use the one good image for both generations? From a head-on view, they're pretty similar.--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 03:17, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about the Click wheel picture. I thought it might be a "universal symbol" for the iPod lineDylpickleh8 (talk) 00:00, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

It's okay; it was an honest mistake.--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 00:34, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Valued/Encyclopedic image proposal

I would propose that Wikipedia adopt a 'Valued' or 'Encyclopedic' images department. The images that garner this status on Wikipedia would have to be tagged with a different template to the Valued or Quality image seals, in order to distinguish between them. I suggest that images that receive this status should be highly encyclopedic images, although not necessarily of excellent quality. Images that illustrate a point in an exemplary manner, for example, could be nominated as these 'Encyclopedic Images'. There would obviously be problems, for example: who defines an image as being encyclopedic or the most valuable of a large group of images? What scope should or could an image be nominated within? Thus, a vote of consensus would be required. I think the initiation of such an area would benefit Wikipedia. Diagrams, sounds and various other media could also be included in this. I would be willing to draw up a draft for the page; however, the decision must first be made. I've seen you around WP:FPC, so I thought you'd be interested. See the Village pump for more information. Elucidate ^{(parlez à moi)} _{Ici pour humor} 08:21, 23 October 2008 (UTC)