User talk:Hillweev

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Hillweev. Thank you for your work on Lina Ghotmeh. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating the article. I noticed there is a notability tag on it. Please consider adding more content to the article and citations that provide significant coverage her and her work in reliable sources. I think she is probably notable based on the Schelling Prize, and it would survive a deletion discussion. I do think it would be great for our readership to know more about this fascinating woman architect!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 00:53, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - Netherzone - for your note and suggestions for improvements. I will continue to add content and sources in hopes of improving the viability of this page. Hillweev (talk) 18:36, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elizabeth Skidmore Sasser (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Blaze Wolf were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The first citation does not appear until the end of the 2nd paragraph. The bulk of the references are supporting the fact that she contributed entries to an encyclopedia which is WP:REFBOMBing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elizabeth Skidmore Sasser and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:20, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hillweev! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:20, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elizabeth Skidmore Sasser (April 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs to lead paragraph to explain who this person is and why they are important. Also what critieria met for WP:NACADEMIC Much of this reads like an obituary / hagiography /memorial.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elizabeth Skidmore Sasser and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:46, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I will continue to edit and address the above mentioned comments and suggestions. Hillweev (talk) 19:51, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Elizabeth Skidmore Sasser

Hello, Hillweev. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Elizabeth Skidmore Sasser, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lina Ghotmeh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lina Ghotmeh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lina Ghotmeh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 22:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]