User talk:Hkgalbert

Hello, Hkgalbert! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 07:55, 4 April 2010 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Phra Pathom Chedi has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqXTDUZpoCw, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NlTr2ZFV5s, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJOSuoH9A3A, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHXG1fD8KPU (matching the regex rule \byoutube\.com). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:55, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Wat Mangkon Kamalawat

Hi. Just to let you know I've reverted your addition of that extra photo to the Wat Mangkon Kamalawat article. I've explained my reasoning on the Talk page. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:31, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Wat San Chao Chet

I've reverted your addition of more Wikilinks to the Wat San Chao Chet article, as it appeared to be a case of over-linking. Essentially, we do not link ordinary English words. And when a word should be linked, we generally only link its first occurrence, not multiple occurrences - we want to add links to useful articles for further reading, but at the same time we need to avoid turning the whole article blue. Please have a look at Wikipedia:LINK, especially the Wikipedia:LINK#Overlinking section. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:36, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Greetings Hkgalbert, I just thought I'd let you know that I say your article Romance in Mekong River in the New Articles list--There is a good number of citations and references.However, I think the article seems to contain a few err

Greetings Hkgalbert, I just thought I'd let you know that I say your article Romance in Mekong River in the New Articles list--There is a good number of citations and references.However, I think the article seems to contain a few errors: some of the article's Wikilinks are broken. Happy editing! Hope your day is going well and you are having fun.Amy Z (talk) 05:18, 23 September 2011 (UTC)