User talk:Howardschwartz

Image Tagging for Image:Desk with 77.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Desk with 77.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:06, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Desk with 77.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Desk with 77.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BrownCow  (how now?) 22:34, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Voices.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Voices.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:26, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Howard Schwartz (broadcaster)[edit]

I have nominated Howard Schwartz (broadcaster), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howard Schwartz (broadcaster). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. BJ^Talk 23:32, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your article[edit]

Hi Howard. Just to let you know, I have deleted your article and userpage again. I'm not sure if you realise what is going on, but your article was deleted as a result of a community discussion at - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howard Schwartz (broadcaster). This discussion determined that your bio does not meet Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and thus should be deleted. The way to overturn this isn't to simply come back and repost the pages again and if that keeps happening we will have to protect the pages from recreation and you could actually end up with your account blocked (especially when you have made no edits to other subjects as people who don't otherwise contribute to Wikipedia and only come here to write about themselves are often seen by many editors as attempting to misuse Wikipedia for vanity and self-promotional purposes). Rather, if you feel that a mistake has been made at the articles for deletion (AFD) discussion, you will need ask for a deletion review where the community will re-consider the original discussion and determine whether a mistake has been made or not. The rationale for deletion at the AFD hinged on the issue of your notability and whether or not you pass Wikipedia's notability guideline which is set out at Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Notability (people). If you take a look at those pages and feel that you pass them, the next thing to do is to compile a list of verifiable sources which meet the reliable sources guideline and the verifiability policy. You will need to be able to present evidence of significant coverage (ie where you are the subject and not just the author of an article or just mentioned in passing) in multiple, reliable, third-party and independent, published sources. Please also note that Wikipedia only reports what reliable sources have already published and does not engage in any original research or original reporting and thus everything in the article must be able to be sourced properly to published sources and not just based on personal knowledge. Please also have a look at the Autobiography and COI guidelines. The Wikipedia community strongly discourages people from writing about themselves and subjects close to them. Regards, Sarah 14:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]