Jump to content

User talk:IJustDiedInYourArms

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Oka well I read the page for "(I Just) Died in Your Arms Tonight," and that's a little creepy. Yeah my friend Steve told me about it, but still... four tildes (LOL JK JK) IJustDiedInYourArms (talk) 23:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC) Yeah I'm like talking to myself[reply]

yeah they deleted my page...i hope they will undelete it. PLEEEEEEEEZE if you're the one who deleted it i love you. IJustDiedInYourArms (talk) 00:24, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You definitely get an A for creativity. The issue with Summer Bowling was not a lack of references but a lack of notability perWikipedia's standards. If you think you can write an article that meets those standards, I suggest creating it in your sandbox, for example at User:IJustDiedInYourArms/Summer Bowling with sources and it can then be moved back to main space if it's notable. How does that sound? I'm happy to give you the content to work with, if you'd like. PS: Love the song :)

That'd be good. Yeah I'd like to not have to write it all over again. And yeah it's an awesome song. I like a lot of old songs. Mostly 60's and 80's. =D IJustDiedInYourArms (talk) 14:31, 11 June 2008 (UTC)IJustDiedInYourArms[reply]

User:IJustDiedInYourArms/Summer Bowling. I highly doubt you'll ever be able to provide notability but you're welcome to try it. Remember it needs to be notable via reliable sources in order to survive main space. I'm a true child of the 80s

TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 15:08, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

[edit]

June 2008

[edit]
  1. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article August 21‎ has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 01:58, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on American Institute of Becka requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 20:00, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as American Institute of Becka, you will be blocked from editing. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 20:04, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How was that a disruptive edit? I made a page about an orginazation I think is pretty freaking notable. If you're homophobic, than that's your fault.

January 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Anna, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Anna was changed by IJustDiedInYourArms (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-01-15T17:18:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:18, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]