Jump to content

User talk:Ian.thomson: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

17 February 2020

15 February 2020

9 February 2020

5 February 2020

2 February 2020

1 February 2020

31 January 2020

  • curprev 15:5715:57, 31 January 2020MarnetteD talk contribs 55,438 bytes −926 previous removal is allowed per WP:OWNTALK undo
  • curprev 13:3413:34, 31 January 2020SineBot talk contribsm 56,364 bytes +286 Signing comment by ACxcv - "You're just toying with these notions, like if the user was plain stupid, uneducated, crazy, or should be embarrased of seeing the obvious, that something is not OK. There is no possible relation between the two subjects that's simple logic, to start with and should be more than enough - unless you want to turn this into something else, and i don't see the point in that. Neither you nor me, or the user, need to fantasise about children's pubic hair... undo
  • curprev 13:3313:33, 31 January 2020ACxcv talk contribs 56,078 bytes +640 You're just toying with these notions, like if the user was plain stupid, uneducated, crazy, or should be embarrased of seeing the obvious, that something is not OK. There is no possible relation between the two subjects that's simple logic, to start with and should be more than enough - unless you want to turn this into something else, and i don't see the point in that. Neither you nor me, or the user, need to fantasise about children's pubic hair while visiting the page. The site policy is a undo
  • curprev 13:0113:01, 31 January 2020Ian.thomson talk contribs 55,438 bytes +937 No edit summary undo
  • curprev 13:0013:00, 31 January 2020MusikBot talk contribsm 54,501 bytes −22 Removing protection templates from unprotected page (more info) undo
  • curprev 12:5712:57, 31 January 2020ACxcv talk contribs 54,523 bytes −108 Runways and pubic hairstyles aren't related in any way. This is just harrassing users, playing with them and calling them dumbasses It's humiliating and degrading to see a boy or a girl's body exposed this way and trying to toy around with these simple notions and saying that by principle wikipedia doesn't censor this shit. Young kids see this and think it's OK to play the same way as well, and it's not, it's repulsive. Encouraging others to expose or to humiliate another person's body is repuls undo
  • curprev 12:5312:53, 31 January 2020ACxcv talk contribs 54,631 bytes +793 No edit summary undo

21 January 2020

4 January 2020

3 January 2020

25 December 2019

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)