User talk:Ibnquhis

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Ibnquhis!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Mujinga (talk) 07:53, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 18:45, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ibnquhis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not agree with this block as this is my only account and I am not a sockpuppet of any user. All my edits have been in good faith, with improvements and the adding/restoration of sources, as evidenced here [1], [2], [3], [4]. I would like to see evidence of this claim, ie through the use of WP:CHECK, and the absence of any evidence will show that I am not a sockpuppet.

Decline reason:

Really obvious checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 20:03, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ibnquhis (talk) 19:00, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ibnquhis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I still do not agree with this block as this is my only account and I am not a sockpuppet of any user. All my edits have been in good faith, with improvements and the adding/restoration of sources, as evidenced here [5], [6], [7], [8]. There is still no evidence of these claims and so I believe I should be unblocked.

Decline reason:

If one of our checkusers says this is a "really obvious" case, something they do not say casually, I'm not going to argue with them. And neither should you. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:31, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ibnquhis (talk) 23:09, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ibnquhis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my first and only account. I have never even made another account so this block, still with a lack of evidence, is not fair.

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. The technical details are as blatantly clear as I've ever seen here and do not match your implication they were created by someone you live with and that you don't know about them. This is the end of the line for that approach in your unblock requests. Yamla (talk) 12:39, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You've created at least four other accounts. If it's not you, explain what's going on. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:45, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi jpgordon, this is the only account I use and have ever made edits from. The pages I edited have a long history of edit wars and what I believe is continued historical revisionism from other users (eg Kirkuk). I added sources to my edits and they have all been clear, such as [5], [6], [7], [8]. The edits I made are simply the same facts added by other users, one of whom has been banned, and I have now been falsely accused of being this user when I am not because of the information I added. These pages are full of POV edits and ethnic wars and all I am trying to do is make them fair and based on accurate sources. Ibnquhis (talk) 20:13, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you create those other accounts? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 22:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Which accounts are you referring to? I am not the only one that uses my IP address. Ibnquhis (talk) 00:54, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with @Jpgordon that the other accounts are extremely obvious using the checkuser tool.

Based on a very quick glance, so far I see:

I will note that these appear to have been created prior to your block. SQL ^{Query Me!} 14:38, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly do not know about these accounts. I have recently told everyone I live with who shares my IP address about Wikipedia so it is likely they made these accounts. However I can honestly tell you I have not used these accounts and I do not know who they belong to. Also this still does not make me a sockpuppet of Kurdiyate352, which is the alleged reason I was unfairly banned, and therefore this ban should be lifted. I hope you can understand. Ibnquhis (talk) 15:41, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]