User talk:Idorunet

Welcome!

Hello, Idorunet, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Also, do not create articles that link to your userpage, that's not how it works on wikipedia. Read some of the rules before you contribute, thank you. Privat e Butcher 20:34, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

Please stop, or else you will be blocked, this is another warning, soon it will be your last, I have faith in you, just stop being a troll. Privat e Butcher 20:41, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop, the next warning will be your last. Privat e Butcher 20:45, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, this is your last warning, soon I will make sure you are blocked. Privat e Butcher 20:47, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking

I've tried to be nice, but now you have to be blocked, I am going to inform admins on your behavior. I'm sorry it had to be like this. Privat e Butcher 20:49, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ok man, stop creating lots of redirect ut of mainspace to your page. From When should we delete a redirect: It is a cross-space redirect out of article space, such as one pointing into the User or Wikipedia namespace. So I'm removing your redirects, and ask you to stop once again. -- ( drini's _vandalproof page ☎ ) 20:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tito xd^(?!?) 20:59, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fir e Fo x 20:04, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't redirect your user talk page

Please don't redirect your user talk page to your user page. Your talk page is critical so that we may communicate with you and also see what others have said to you in the past. Redirecting it isn't going to accomplish anything except to aggravate your situation further. Thanks. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 15:53, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

will you undelete my userpage then? it was not hurting anyone.

Block

I've blocked you for 15 minutes for vandalizing Drini's user page and my user page. Please refrain from doing this in the future. Ac e tic '^Acid 16:12, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Why not block indefinently. Anyone who views his edit history can see that is the only sensible thing to do. Done. Thue | talk 16:17, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal

I'll unprotect your page if you agree to stop vandalism AND to stop creating redirects from article namespace to your userpage (and of course, not blanking this notice). -- ( drini's _vandalproof page ☎ ) 16:36, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism was in retaliation to vandalism on my page, no more. And yes I agree. i need unblock also because other admin placed block on my account

Note however that you were vandalizing before your page was protected. But it's unprotected now. Go and sin no more. -- ( drini's _vandalproof page ☎ ) 17:04, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

October 31, 2005

This message is regarding the article Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Wackymacs. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Striking out the votes of others is uncivil. Tito xd^(?!?) 01:57, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Please do not tamper with votes during an RFA, b-crats will sort out good/bad votes. I have blocked you for 15 minutes, please consider your edits in the future. Thanks. «»Who ?¿?^meta 01:58, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Solidarnosc

Wikipedia has no policies, applied consistently. All the admins on en-l openly admit counting any shred of persanal fairness as mattering less than developing Wikipedia as they wish. Blocking of only 1 side when 2 sides have done exactly the same thing that the block is supposed to have been for, is routine. It's what happened to me too, and claiming to have any rights against a biased 2-day block actually was the offence that got me permablocked, after only 5 weeks' membership. Look at all these: a voice from within Wikipedia's own system describes how the ArbCom and dispute resolution systems are rigged with discretionary catch-alls that always enable admin to win http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2005-June/024230.html on how force of group numbers dictates Wikipedia pages's content http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2005-July/025936.html this is actually called "don't bother reporting abusive admins" http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2005-July/025921.html I was wary of how the umpiring of pages the whole world can fight over could possibly work well, but I was drawn into Wikipedia by a friend who was briefly (and no longer is, already!) having good experiences with sharing his medical concerns on a couple of pages on medical subjects. Here are 2 administrators saying to me http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2005-August/027816.html http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2005-August/027817.html saying "You are not entitled to anything" and "Wikipedia is not a democracy." On the nature of Wikipedia: http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2005-July/025583.html http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/08/322087.html http://spectrum-fairness.blog.co.uk/ tag "Wikipedia" messages of support: "some of the people on there do seem pretty sarcastic and bullying .... some of the right-wingers on there seem to think mentioning anything negative but factual about Reagan or Bush constitutes bias and there do seem to be some nasty characters on there." - from Aspievision, http://s13.invisionfree.com/aspievision/index.php "You are not the only one who has had problems with Wikipedia taking sides in a dispute, and being blatantly unfair to the other side without even giving them a chance to defend themselves." from FAMSecretSociety, a Yahoo group " of late I've noticed that some independent contributions have been either radically edited or censored. I've not had time to check articles on 9/11, the London Bombings, the assault on Falluja etc, but judging from the way content was edited promptly out of articles on SSRIs, schizophrenia and Asperger's, there definitely seem to be operatives in place ready to clamp down on anything that may cast doubt on establishment canards." from Medialens, http://www.medialens.org/board/ 193.39.159.3

Oversized image on your user page

Please do not put oversized images on your user page. It will crash some (less stable) browsers. --Nlu (talk) 09:40, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism

This is the only warning you will receive.
Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Ned Scott 09:42, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]