User talk:Igoody

Welcome

Igoody, good luck, and have fun. – Dusti^*poke* 00:43, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Goniobranchus aureopurpureus

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because the changes were not sourced . Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Flat Out let's discuss it 15:26, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Scarsdale medical diet may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Diet ''The Complete Scarsdale Medical Diet plus Dr. Tarnower's Lifetime Keep-Slim Program'']) by [[Scarsdale, New York]] [[physician]] [[Herman Tarnower]] with the co-author [[Samm Sinclair

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:08, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:EDTA Chelate.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:EDTA Chelate.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:59, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rivalus

I have looked at your sandbox article for 'Rivalus'. You are doing very well for an editor who has only just started. Technically, you have done a good job, and it meets the standard for a new article: references, layout etc. I would have some concerns about the topic. WP is not intended as a platform for companies to promote themselves. There is a fine line between self promotion and the legitimate recording of facts about a notable (WP:NOTABLE) subject. You might need to read up the WP documentation about what standards must be met by all articles e.g. WP:NPOV , WP:REFERENCE. There are other articles that specifically address what is acceptable for articles about business entities, but I do not have time to look it up for you. I am hardly editing at all at present and my time is very much taken up by other things. I wish you well as a new editor - you clearly have the skills to do some really useful work for WP. I will watch your Talk Page (this one) to talk to you. If I do not respond leave a reminder on MY Talk Page. Regards --Greenmaven (talk) 23:54, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rivalus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rivalus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rivalus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —rybec 00:02, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]