User talk:Ikmensah

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roots tourism (April 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Genealogy tourism. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roots tourism and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 16:46, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Teahouse, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 16:46, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Roots tourism concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Roots tourism, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:51, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright on Wikipedia[edit]

Hello, Ikmensah. Thank you for offering information on roots tourism. The draft article has had to be deleted, I'm afraid, as parts of it seemed to have been copied from other sources (specifically http://legacy.guardian.co.tt/archives/2006-09-07/greater-caribbean.html and https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249024007_An_Exploratory_Study_of_the_Tourism_Migration-Immigration_Nexus_Travel_Experiences_of_Chinese_Residents_in_New_Zealand). However, information in new language has been added to Genealogy tourism.

As a website hosted in the United States, Wikipedia is subject to U.S. copyright law; as one of our core movement values is creating and spreading free content, we are beyond that conservative in the use of copyrighted content even where law might allow (such as fair use). Except for brief and clearly marked quotations, all information you take from copyrighted sources should be put into your own words and structure. (Most sources are copyrighted, even if they are not marked so.) Wikipedia:Copy-paste has more information on our approach to copyright.

Thank you again for bringing us information. I hope you will choose to continue further. If you have questions about copyright or any other aspect of editing Wikipedia, I recommend a visit to the Wikipedia:Teahouse, which is meant to be a welcoming environment for newcomers. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:21, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]