User talk:Indischaroller

August 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Baltimore. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. No, adding fake refs isn't going to work Meters (talk) 07:29, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Pin trading ‎. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. And on Trade and Lowy Institute. Meters (talk) 07:32, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 08:14, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

if im going banned, so why you dont banned or reverted on this article > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baltimore

as you can see on citations number 121 on words "Baltimore City Police History", that links provides promotions and advertising. this isn't fair. you should delete that links too or unban me.

this is reference if you dont see where's the link (note : delete the quotation mark) :

"Central Baltimore, originally called the Middle District" Indischaroller (talk) 09:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Right... we're going to unblock you because a ref URL was usurped. Usurped ref fixed. Meters (talk) 09:28, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

so i still can't edit ? i see some articles just like this on wikipedia, being redirect and provides advertising by them. you wanna see more ? Indischaroller (talk) 09:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By all means, point us to more usurped URLS so we can fix them, but you are not going to be unblocked. Meters (talk) 09:53, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://ms.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengaluru

Laman web Bangalore Mahanagara Palike < Anchor text

it appears on all language

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historia_de_M%C3%A9xico

as you can see on referencias number 180, on anchor text:

"30 de octubre de 2016" el original

https://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuna_(NDH)

as you can see on Izvori number 4, you can see text :

"arhivirana 25. srpnja 2016." and hyperlinked on text "izvorne stranice"

https://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esplendor_Geom%C3%A9trico

you can see referencies number 3, anchor text :

"Esplendor Geométrico: entrevista con Arturo Lanz" and Arxivat de l'original

https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enrique_Pe%C3%B1a_Nieto

you can see referencies number 34, on anchor text :

"Arquivado do original em 30 de outubro de 2016"

https://ast.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miguel_%C3%81ngel_Osorio_Chong

you can see referencies on number 19, on achor text :

"Apauto per Méxicu (29 d'avientu de 2012)." and «¿Cómo se llogró?»

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vimanapura

you can see on reference number 5, on anchor text :

"Notification at BMP website"

https://wuu.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%8F%AD%E5%8A%A0%E7%BD%97%E5%B0%94

you can find it on anchor text : "Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike ——政府网站"

https://jv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pandji_Pragiwaksono

you can find it on anchor text : "Kaca laman wèb saka Pandji Pragiwaksono"

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%8B

you can find it on anchor text :

"Fossil Monitor Lizards" beside text "Архивная копия от 27 октября 2010 на Wayback Machine." Indischaroller (talk) 14:34, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i think you not fix it yet. this is not so fair Indischaroller (talk) 04:43, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you can add the following text to the bottom of this page page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. If you do that, it will bring an uninvolved admin here to review your unblock request. Bishonen | tålk 10:48, 1 August 2024 (UTC).[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Indischaroller (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i just following the link that i've reported, and i think i can do same as they do. but why im banned, then they're not banned ? if you need the list of their link, i can give you all the list Indischaroller (talk) 14:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See WP:OTHERSTUFF. And then reread WP:GAB to understand how to craft an appropriate unblock request. Yamla (talk) 15:50, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.