User talk:IndusFish

This is IndusFish's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1

Archives

Alignment

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

What am I doing wrong here? Why is this not living up like it should? IndusFish (talk) 16:01, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TWA badges set things up so they can be aligned in columns on a page, rather than one under another. This sometimes leaves a place that will capture the next <div> and cause it to display incorrectly. The problem can usually be fixed by adding a {{clear}} template before the following section header. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:18, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a {{clear}} can help with user userboxes, too. The code setting these up specifies their width as 33% of the available width, or something like that. If you keep adding 33%, each third box goes to a new line because the 1% left is not wide enough for it. But an unsuspecting section header can get swallowed into that 1% space, since it did not include its own assertion of how much space it should take. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:55, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. IndusFish (talk) 11:34, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

common.js

Hi IndusFish, please excuse me for the unexpected message. I had been having a look at Special:NewPages for an entirely unrelated reason, and this page creation appeared. I have now patrolled the page -- but I'd just like to note that closing AfDs at this point is likely not a good idea. If I may make a personal recommendation, I'd recommend participating in more AfDs before closing the first one. As far as I can see, there has been participation in exactly one deletion discussion so far, with consensus against your detailled argument. I'm sorry if this is a weird request, and you're absolutely free to try the script... but when I saw that page creation, I had an uneasy feeling that I felt I had to voice before potential disruption happens. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:14, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ToBeFree I just started using WP:Twinkle and that change some menu options, I was just trying to see if adding WP:XFD closer will do something similar. Just messing around with settings, reading guides, policies, and essay and trying to experiment a little. I agree with you, I don't plan on closing any AfDs anytime soon. I appreciate you looking out and giving me guidance. IndusFish (talk) 01:19, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. No worries, enjoy the experiments.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IndusFish (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why am I blocked? IndusFish (talk) 17:46, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:03, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yamla, How can I even make a convincing argument when I don't even know what I was blocked. I got no warnings no explanation. I was editing a article and all of a sudden I could not submit my changes because I was blocked. I have not, to the best of knowledge, caused any disruption or damage, I have been as useful as I can be. IndusFish (talk) 18:07, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IndusFish (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How can I even make a convincing argument when I don't even know what I was blocked. I got no warnings no explanation. I was editing a article and all of a sudden I could not submit my changes because I was blocked. I have not, to the best of knowledge, caused any disruption or damage, I have been as useful as I can be. IndusFish (talk) 18:17, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked because there is technical and behavioral evidence that you are a sockpuppet of TheGreatWikiLord. You need to address both in order to be unblocked. MER-C 19:11, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MER-C What "behavioral evidence" are you talking about? How can I go about addressing that? Also how does one address "technical evidence"? IndusFish (talk) 19:55, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks. MER-C 20:05, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MER-C Can you elaborate on what "behavioral evidence" led to this block? IndusFish (talk) 20:07, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bbb23, Can you please identify what "behavioral evidence" led to this block, so I can see how I can go about addressing it. Thanks. IndusFish (talk) 20:18, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What evidence

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IndusFish (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am trying to see why I was blocked. I am told it was because of wp:SPI. I was never informed of it. I am also told it is becasue of ""behavioral evidence" and "technical evidence" of wp:Sock. Yet, no one will tell me that this "behavioral evidence" they are talking about. What can I do?

Decline reason:

You're on the same IP address as TheGreatWikiLord, and you're using the same computer. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:40, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Behavioral evidence

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IndusFish (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What "behavioral evidence" was used against me. How come one will answer my question?

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:13, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

IndusFish (talk) 15:32, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've revoked TPA.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:42, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The evidence against you is exactly what I said: You're on the same IP address as TheGreatWikiLord, and you're using the same computer. Because your talk page access was revoked, you will probably need to address this via WP:UTRS. You have an open unblock request here, but it does not address what I said the evidence is. If you believe that you were blocked without enough evidence, you can appeal to Arbcom via Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Ban appeals. However, I wouldn't recommend that. The best use of your time is to either 1) explain on UTRS why you are on the same IP address as TheGreatWikiLord, or 2) make an unblock request via UTRS from your original account that admits to sock puppetry. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:41, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me I am blocked

{{help me}} How can I find out what "behavioral evidence" was used to block me? IndusFish (talk) 02:58, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This section is redundant to the above unblock request; the non-admin "help me" helpers can not provide additional assistance. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:25, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jatt Jeona Mour concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jatt Jeona Mour, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]