User talk:Infomanfromearth

hi guys

2023 G20 New Delhi summit moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2023 G20 New Delhi summit, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Akevsharma (talk) 04:26, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2023 G20 New Delhi summit

Hello, Infomanfromearth. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2023 G20 New Delhi summit, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:04, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2023 G20 New Delhi summit

Hello, Infomanfromearth. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2023 G20 New Delhi summit".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:25, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Fowl Twins Get What They Deserve

Hello, Infomanfromearth. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Fowl Twins Get What They Deserve, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:26, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 G20 New Delhi summit (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at 2023 G20 New Delhi summit instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023 G20 New Delhi summit and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:54, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Infomanfromearth! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:54, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:2023 G20 New Delhi summit

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:2023 G20 New Delhi summit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/india-preps-for-g20-presidency-from-1-dec-greenlights-setting-up-a-secretariat-101644938503470.html and https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/cabinet-approves-g20-secretariat-for-presidency-prep-101644947803571.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:58, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tiametmarduk (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tiametmarduk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 12:29, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tiametmarduk (January 31)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Jamiebuba (talk) 12:52, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tobruk

Are there any Reliable Sources that use the terms 1st, 2nd and 3rd sieges of Tobruk? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 13:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No-one officially calls the 1st one an actual siege, but a lot of sources mention that the germans and Italians were hoping to make it that way, "Against the hopes of both the Italian and German high commands, Tobruk was quickly overrun by the British after a brief battle in January"

one source though timetoast, did say "The siege of Tobruk began on January 21, 1941 and ended on December 7, 1941" thus making the 1st Siege of Tobruk incorporated in it overall, as a lot of sources say it is outside, this makes it in my estimations a separate siege.

The 3rd is also not mentioned as one by a lot of sources however History of War has got the title of this engage, The Siege of Tobruk 17-21st June.

Both of these claimed are used by Google and Microsoft when i looked them up to do research, and i myself use History of War, when researching stuff for my work, timetoast i'm not sure about but i seem to remember them as an youtube channel so unless they did bad research i can't see them being unreliable. Infomanfromearth (talk) 13:28, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where have you sought consensus to move these articles? Lyndaship (talk) 13:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I fear that you have strayed onto original research. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 13:45, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK Infomanfromearth (talk) 16:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Siege of Tobruk - Wikipedia it was a few months ago 30th of Jan to be precise Infomanfromearth (talk) 16:19, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Axis capture of Tobruk, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ——Serial Number 54129 14:43, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've also undone your page moves of the other two sieges. Please begin a talk page discussion as to why you think they should be moved, providing evidence that your suggestions are the common name used in independent, third-party reliable sources, in order to allow a consensus to form. Thanks! ——Serial Number 54129 14:52, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Alexander the Great. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. You changed article text "A 1998 article" to "A 1996 article" with the edit summary "the article which was stated to have been done in 1998 was actually in 1996". This was blatantly contrary to our correct and explicit citation as June 1998 and to the dating at the cited URL, "Published June 11, 1998". NebY (talk) 15:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it was a misprint because 1996 is mentioned as the date of the article in the landmark arrian, the campaigns of alexander, which was translated by Pamela Mensch and edited by James Romm. This includes appendixes written by modern day historians, in one of these was on alexanders death and included talking about this article and said that the article was complied in a 1996 meeting and the meeting minutes included in the article. my thoughts were that the article was completed and published in the same year which could be wrong and maybe editing took 2 years, if i am wrong then i apologise but if i am correct and this the case, then maybe editing should be something along the lines of "in a 1998 article, which explained the events of a 1996 meeting." Infomanfromearth (talk) 16:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tiametmarduk

Hello, Infomanfromearth. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tiametmarduk, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tiametmarduk

Hello, Infomanfromearth. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Tiametmarduk".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:11, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]