User talk:Isabpc

Welcome!

Hello, Isabpc!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 02:18, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:29, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Isabpc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

IsabpcGood is my friend who thought it would be funny to start screwing around and trying to get me blocked by adding online alias 'Isabpc' to the South Windsor Connecticut wikipedia page. I'm actually trying to contribute to wikipedia and my friend is trying to ruin that. It's not me on both accounts, its me (Isabpc) and my friend (IsabpcGood) I'm sorry if thats what it looked like, and I would've made the same decision as you. Sorry for the misunderstanding.' Isabpc (talk) 21:54, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I might rethink my friendship if I were you, as your friend has now ruined your ability to edit Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 23:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How was I supposed to know what he would do? It was literally my first day of using wikipedia, I don't know if you understood what happened, he created an account to try to impersonate me, i wasn't planning on rethinking our friendship because he kinda jsut did it out of the blue[[[User:Isabpc|Isabpc]] (talk) 22:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your choice of friends is, of course, up to you. But the fact remains that he has ruined your ability to edit Wikipedia. You can make another unblock request for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 23:42, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Isabpc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had no clue that my friend at the time would create the account and try to "ruin my ability to use Wikipedia" It's out of my ability to make him stop, even though I had told him NUMEROUS times to do so and even righted HIS wrongs by undoing what he did and then told him kindly and the other Wikipedia admins that what he did was wrong. I'm sorry if this wasted your time or made you guys confused. this was a misunderstanding and I hope you can give me a second chance and you have all the rights to block me if I do anything wrong. I will continue to do the right thing and help edit and add to the Connecticut wikipedia pages.

Decline reason:

The more I read this the less sense it makes. So your friend creates an account, gets blocked ... but then you're using it to request unblock? How is it that you know the password if he created it?

This is actually a grave issue for us. Our general rule has always been "one user, one account"—unblocking this one would, from what you have told us, restore to full use an account which two people (well, at least two people) have been known to use. We're not doing that.

It really sounds like the only thing we can say is that this account is compromised, so we will have to leave it blocked. If you are truly sincere in what you tell us, you'd be better off starting a new account with a new password, and disclosing this sordid affair over there so we know you're not trying to pull one over on us. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:32, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Isabpc (talk) 23:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Case I don't think this account is compromised, see Isabpcgood which I think is what this person is referring to. 331dot (talk) 08:29, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Then they should request unblock over there. Daniel Case (talk) 17:20, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Again, to make this clear, I created THIS account and my friend created isabpcgood to try to impersonate ME, It was not compromised, and this isnt a sockpuppet account, Isabpc and Isabpcgood are two separate accounts, Isabpc, which was created by me in which I did nothing to ruin Wikipedia, and my friend, who, unfortunately had an eerily similar name as mine, did, in fact do bad things to wikipedia, Not me. Again. Nobody has hacked my account, My friend copied my name and ruined wikipedia, Not me.

Thanks,

Isabpc Isabpc (talk) 19:18, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Isabpcgood Is not me, it is a different person that I have no control over Isabpc (talk) 19:19, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have also made myself familiar with all of the Wikipedia rules Isabpc (talk) 23:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Isabpc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to express my deepest apologies for the recent incident where my friend IsabpcGood impersonated my account and made inappropriate changes to Wikipedia articles. I want to clarify that I had no involvement in these actions and I take full responsibility for not telling him off for doing so. I understand that these actions are against Wikipedia's policies, and I am willing to cooperate with the moderators to rectify the situation. I assure you that this will not happen again, and I will take all necessary measures to prevent people from impersonating me in the future. Once again, I apologize for any inconvenience caused and I hope that you will consider unblocking my account so that I can continue to contribute positively to the Wikipedia community. I have tried to appeal my ban which hasn't been answered for weeks and I do not want to create a new account, do I have to create a new account because I was banned for sockpuppeting?

Sincerely,

Isabpc Isabpc (talk) 22:59, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 09:13, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Isabpc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to express my deepest apologies for the recent incident where my friend IsabpcGood impersonated my account and made inappropriate changes to Wikipedia articles. I want to clarify that I had no involvement in these actions and I take full responsibility for not telling him off for doing so. I understand that these actions are against Wikipedia's policies, and I am willing to cooperate with the moderators to rectify the situation. I assure you that this will not happen again, and I will take all necessary measures to prevent people from impersonating me in the future. Once again, I apologize for any inconvenience caused and I hope that you will consider unblocking my account so that I can continue to contribute positively to the Wikipedia community. Sincerely, :Isabpc

Accept reason:

I'm inclined to give this editor a second chance and accept. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 05:54, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CLEANSTART Isabpc (talk) 22:56, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]