User talk:Isarra
| This is Isarra's talk page, where you may chat amicably with a bear. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 | |||
September Women in Red edithons[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A cup of tea for you![edit]
|
Just thinking of you fondly. That is all. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 10:31, 15 November 2020 (UTC) |
- @I dream of horses: <3 -— Isarra ༆ 16:19, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Big props to you.[edit]
I was procrastinating today and reading about WikiProjects, so I ended up going through all the newsletters for WikiProject X, and that final report on Meta almost brought me to tears. I've also had the experience of funding not going far enough as shrinking teams go through the motions on projects that continually run over cost estimates while everybody becomes depressed at the launch getting further and further away. It fucking sucks, man!!! I offer my condolences for how it turned out, and my heartfelt thanks to you for sticking it out for as long as you did. Thanks! jp×g 04:55, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
- @JPxG: Aye. But funding not going far enough is (potentially) fine. Getting stuck in the mindset that you need to deliver as promised regardless of how far the funding went, on the other hand, is another matter entirely. Context varies, but with these kinds of projects it's rarely so simple, and we do not owe our very sanity to the movement...
- With grants, we owe what was funded, and the relevant reporting such that whatever problems arose can be avoided in future projects. We do not necessarily owe whatever we thought that funding could do. -— Isarra ༆ 03:56, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The file File:WPX WiR screenshot.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused image, no value in transferring to Commons.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 08:33, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar |
| Thank you for making the Timeless theme (which I found out was a thing from Ghostarchive, and not Wikimedia, suprisingly). Its a cool theme, Wikimedia should make it the default. Rlink2 (talk) 15:17, 9 April 2022 (UTC) |