User talk:JCMLuis/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions about User:JCMLuis. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Userbox request - Editors who may be confused, and are happy to be confused
Hi I heard you made userboxes; "I am happy to be confused" and would like to have a userbox that said the same thing!
Regards and thanks in advanceFlibbertigibbets (talk) 00:55, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Flibbertigibbets: Done
Wikitext | userbox | where used |
---|---|---|
{{User:JCMLuis/UBX/Happy to be confused}}
|
linked pages |
luis. 💬 14:11, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Very happy.. and confused.. thanks Flibbertigibbets (talk) 14:48, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Userbox request
@JCMLuis: Please put in Category:Channel Four Television Corporation user templates, Category:Seven West Media user templates and Category:UKTV user templates.
This user watches E4 Extra.
This user watches 4Music.
This user watches 4seven.
This user watches Film4.
This user watches The Box.
This user watches 7HD.
This user watches 7mate.
This user watches 7flix.
This user watches W.
This user watches Yesterday.
Catfurball (talk) 18:38, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Catfurball: Done
Wikitext | userbox | where used | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{User:JCMLuis/UBX/7HD}}
|
|
linked pages | ||
{{User:JCMLuis/UBX/7mate}}
|
|
linked pages | ||
{{User:JCMLuis/UBX/7flix}}
|
|
linked pages | ||
{{User:JCMLuis/UBX/W (British TV channel)}}
|
|
linked pages | ||
{{User:JCMLuis/UBX/Yesterday (TV channel)}}
|
|
linked pages | ||
{{User:JCMLuis/UBX/Film4}}
|
|
linked pages | ||
{{User:JCMLuis/UBX/4Music}}
|
|
linked pages | ||
{{User:JCMLuis/UBX/4seven}}
|
|
linked pages | ||
{{User:JCMLuis/UBX/E4 Extra}}
|
|
linked pages | ||
{{User:JCMLuis/UBX/The Box}}
|
|
linked pages |
Film4 one already existed, just changed the category. luis. 💬 22:48, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
@JCMLuis: Please put them in Category:New Zealand television broadcasting user templates.
This user watches Eden.
This user watches Face TV.
This user watches Prime.
This user subscribes to SoHo.
This user watches TVNZ 1.
This user watches TVNZ 2.
This user watches TVNZ Duke.
Catfurball (talk) 20:56, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Catfurball: Done
Wikitext | userbox | where used | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{User:JCMLuis/UBX/Eden}}
|
|
linked pages | ||
{{User:JCMLuis/UBX/Face TV}}
|
|
linked pages | ||
{{User:JCMLuis/UBX/Prime}}
|
|
linked pages | ||
{{User:JCMLuis/UBX/SoHo}}
|
|
linked pages | ||
{{User:JCMLuis/UBX/TVNZ 1}}
|
|
linked pages | ||
{{User:JCMLuis/UBX/TVNZ 2}}
|
|
linked pages | ||
{{User:JCMLuis/UBX/TVNZ Duke}}
|
|
linked pages |
luis. 💬 22:21, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Userbox request for WP:APARKS
Good evening Luis,
I am in the process of making userboxes for the WikiProject, WP:APARKS. I wanted to inquire if you could simplify a userbox idea I had, seeing you are one of the active editors taking requests. The userboxes are below. They are of a simple design, with the idea that a user can use the |red/blue input to change the color to a preferred blue or red scheme (e.g. {{User:User/Userbox/ACE member|red}} or {{User:User/Userbox/ACE member|blue}}). Would you think that is possible, or should I make two userboxes templates instead? Any and all help would be appreciated!
ACE | This user is a member of American Coaster Enthusiasts |
ACE | This user is a member of American Coaster Enthusiasts |
Adog (Talk・Cont) 05:41, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Adog: It is 100% possible to make a switch input in a userbox. I have done this with some of my userboxes and seen some userboxes like that. The template (or parser function) for your userbox would be:
- {{#switch:{{{1}}}|red=COLOR_HERE|blue=COLOR_HERE}}
- You can put the template above in the id-c and border-c parameters and when you use the parser function, it should change color. luis. 💬 13:42, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, very much appreciated. Learning this template/userbox code is both confusing and amazing. Adog (Talk・Cont) 14:35, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Link to Wikipedia.
How to link my blog to Wikipedia Blackbuckrealty (talk) 17:47, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Blackbuckrealty: Wikipedia is not a place for advertising. Please familiarize yourself with the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia. Continuously advertising your blog can result in you being blocked from editing. luis. 💬 17:51, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Colour contrast
Hi Luis. I notice that some of the userboxes you've created recently (including {{User:JCMLuis/UBX/Not enough GWR locomotive articles}}
, {{User:JCMLuis/UBX/Not enough LNER locomotive articles}}
, and {{User:JCMLuis/UBX/Not enough LMS locomotive articles}}
) use colour combinations that have very little contrast between the text and the background colour. This is contrary to MOS:CONTRAST, which – as an accessibility provision – applies not just in article space but across the entire project. I'd be grateful if you could please make appropriate modifications to correct this. Thanks. XAM2175 (T) 12:07, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello
Why is the information always being deleted 165.234.104.4 (talk) 16:52, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Your questionable data
You provided the pressure of the first tropical depression recognised by the Japan Meteorological Agency in 2023 as 996 hPa, but the lowest was estimated 1008 hPa. How did you get that data? 🐱💬 04:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- I chose the wrong tropical low and used its data from the same raw data. I didn't know the TD data would be at the bottom. I didn't even scroll down. luis 💬 12:14, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Typhoon Jelawat (2018) has a new comment
Infobox conversion
The boxes will be moved over to the new infobox eventually using a box. Please avoid mass-adding the new infobox for now, since they don't include TemplateData and might break articles for users using the VisualEditor. Chlod (say hi!) 22:19, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Oh ok, thanks for letting me know. luis 💬 22:21, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Chlod: Would it be okay for me to continue converting the boxes? I am starting to see them more frequently on other articles. luis 💬 15:07, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- @JCMLuis: I've finished adding TemplateData for all the boxes so the above shouldn't be an issue anymore. Fire away! 🫡 Do also tell me if there's some boxes that you have issues with; I'll try to get those fixed when I can. Chlod (say hi!) 15:09, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- @JCMLuis: Please don't supply a blank
|ibtracs=
when converting. This disables automatic linking entirely. Chlod (say hi!) 04:17, 19 April 2023 (UTC)- @Chlod: I didn't know, my bad. I have removed the empty parameters. I will be adding the IBTrACS IDs on Wikidata later.
- Also, I encountered 2 problems while converting the infoboxes. One from attempting to convert on Tropical storms Amanda and Cristobal and another on Tropical Storm Gordon (2018):
- For Amanda and Cristobal, I copied the pressure-prefix parameter from the deprecated infobox into the new infobox, and when I checked the preview, the content in the parameter was sort of duplicated. This also does the same for the winds-prefix parameter.
- For Gordon, the damage costs ranged around $200–250 million, but I don't know how to make it ranged.
- luis 💬 14:27, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for your work! Could you place the problematic infoboxes on a sandbox so I can take a look and try to find a solution? It's a bit hard to visualize what's being done without seeing the template code (except for the Gordon one; I do know a possible solution but I still need a reference). If you'd like, you can use User:Chlod/playground. Chlod (say hi!) 14:30, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
- I've added the infobox in this sandbox. As you see in editing, the contents in the parameters are clearly not duplicated. luis 💬 14:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
- @JCMLuis: Ah, these are supposed to be on different subboxes entirely; one below the history box for Amanda, and the other below the one for Cristobal. The arrangement of boxes are not locked to support this behavior; see Template:Infobox weather event#Example for an example. Chlod (say hi!) 14:43, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Chlod: The old infobox for Amanda & Cristobal has been converted, although I still don't understand how the content duplicates. What about Gordon? The template used for estimating damages clearly does not support ranged damages. luis 💬 14:57, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
- I'll still have to work on supporting ranged damages. As for why the content duplicates, the prefix is added twice: one before the value in km/h, and another before the value in mph. This shows up as "~181 km/h (~112 mph)" for example (with
~
being the prefix). Chlod (say hi!) 15:02, 19 April 2023 (UTC)- Oh, I get it now. Thanks for the help. luis 💬 15:10, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Chlod: I have another question. For the extratropical parameter, should the year be included? luis 💬 15:41, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
- This is up to the editor, and there's no common consensus as of now. Chlod (say hi!) 15:42, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
- Alright, thanks for the quick response. luis 💬 15:43, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
- This is up to the editor, and there's no common consensus as of now. Chlod (say hi!) 15:42, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
- I'll still have to work on supporting ranged damages. As for why the content duplicates, the prefix is added twice: one before the value in km/h, and another before the value in mph. This shows up as "~181 km/h (~112 mph)" for example (with
- @Chlod: The old infobox for Amanda & Cristobal has been converted, although I still don't understand how the content duplicates. What about Gordon? The template used for estimating damages clearly does not support ranged damages. luis 💬 14:57, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
- @JCMLuis: Ah, these are supposed to be on different subboxes entirely; one below the history box for Amanda, and the other below the one for Cristobal. The arrangement of boxes are not locked to support this behavior; see Template:Infobox weather event#Example for an example. Chlod (say hi!) 14:43, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
- I've added the infobox in this sandbox. As you see in editing, the contents in the parameters are clearly not duplicated. luis 💬 14:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for your work! Could you place the problematic infoboxes on a sandbox so I can take a look and try to find a solution? It's a bit hard to visualize what's being done without seeing the template code (except for the Gordon one; I do know a possible solution but I still need a reference). If you'd like, you can use User:Chlod/playground. Chlod (say hi!) 14:30, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
- @JCMLuis: Please don't supply a blank
- @JCMLuis: I've finished adding TemplateData for all the boxes so the above shouldn't be an issue anymore. Fire away! 🫡 Do also tell me if there's some boxes that you have issues with; I'll try to get those fixed when I can. Chlod (say hi!) 15:09, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Typhoon Jelawat (2018) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Turnagra (talk) 00:43, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: 2001 Typhoon Chebi has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Ortizesp (talk) 21:06, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Unblock request
JCMLuis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 136.228.217.189. I am caught by two IP blocks that go in rotation each time I go unblocked and then blocked again. Also, the unblocked IP is only blocked towards unregistered users. luis 💬 12:30, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
That IP address belongs to the iboss VPN. You'll need to disable your VPN if you wish to edit here. Yamla (talk) 13:59, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- @Yamla: That is something I cannot do. The device I'm using is administered, and disabling it is not an option. luis 💬 14:04, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- In that case, please see WP:IPBE. --Yamla (talk) 14:12, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Typhoon Jelawat (2018)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Typhoon Jelawat (2018) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JayTee32 -- JayTee32 (talk) 21:21, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Typhoon Jelawat (2018)
The article Typhoon Jelawat (2018) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Typhoon Jelawat (2018) for comments about the article, and Talk:Typhoon Jelawat (2018)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JayTee32 -- JayTee32 (talk) 00:42, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
For contributing to a staggering 99.3% of the 35,000-bite Typhoon Jelawat (2018) article and taking it all the way to GA! Great work! JayTee⛈️ 00:43, 22 November 2023 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Typhoon Faxai (2001) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Hey man im josh (talk) 16:11, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Oopsies
Please accept my apologies for the revert at the Faxai article – that was a misclick, and I reverted myself as quickly as I could. --Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 17:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Faxai
Why did you revert my edits to that article. I suppose the edits where I copyedited, I'd understand, but why did you revert the edit that implemented the new color palette for tropical cyclone tracks? ''Flux55'' (talk) 23:48, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Tropical Storm Debby (2006)
An article that you have been involved in editing—Tropical Storm Debby (2006)—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please follow the (Discuss) link at the top of the article to participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. ''Flux55'' (talk) 03:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Gritty is agood article
Case in point Americanfreedom (talk) 16:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Americanfreedom: It is not a good article until it has been through the reviewing process. You should read the instructions before nominating the article. luis 💬 18:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Also, if you're saying that because it was recently listed, that is because another user also added the good article icon even though it is incorrect. luis 💬 18:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Hurricane Fran (1973)
An article that you have been involved in editing—Hurricane Fran (1973)—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. ''Flux55'' (talk) 18:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Typhoon Faxai (2001)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Typhoon Faxai (2001) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh? -- I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh? (talk) 14:45, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Typhoon Faxai (2001)
The article Typhoon Faxai (2001) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Typhoon Faxai (2001) and Talk:Typhoon Faxai (2001)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh? -- I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh? (talk) 16:02, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Typhoon Faxai (2001)
The article Typhoon Faxai (2001) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Typhoon Faxai (2001) for comments about the article, and Talk:Typhoon Faxai (2001)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh? -- I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh? (talk) 12:09, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Typhoon Wutip (2019)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Typhoon Wutip (2019) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Riley1012 -- Riley1012 (talk) 21:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Typhoon Wutip (2019)
The article Typhoon Wutip (2019) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Typhoon Wutip (2019) and Talk:Typhoon Wutip (2019)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Riley1012 -- Riley1012 (talk) 16:01, 28 March 2024 (UTC)