User talk:Jacquesdav

Welcome!

Hello, Jacquesdav, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 14:25, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Immervision (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Otterathome was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Immervision and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Otterathome (talk) 18:27, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Immervision (September 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Notability cannot be gauged by existence or activities alone, but instead actually with major independent news that wasn't influenced or tied to announcements or notices since this wouldn't count into notability itself, and this is applied to companies like with any other subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Immervision and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 19:47, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Immervision (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Narutolovehinata5 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Immervision and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:56, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Jacquesdav, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:56, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. SwisterTwister talk 17:07, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

promotional content

Hi, I noticed your question about promotional content at the teahouse and I believe there's a mis-understanding here. In the draft article it is mentioned four times that your citations don't show notability. The word "promotional" does not appear there, that only mysteriously shows up on this talk page?? Which doesn't count against your draft. I like it, well done and good luck with it! Dougmcdonell (talk) 07:56, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Doug... still waiting for a response from the Wikipedia editors.

Looking back in, I see it may help if I can explain. So the current article qualifies for any removal or objection to said article by our WP:Deletion policy since it's highly resembling of a sales pitch, not to your standards. SwisterTwister talk 15:09, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SwisterTwister talk: Thanks for the clarification. However might I ask you to printout those sections/paragraphs/passages or even specific word use that gives the impression of it being a sales pitch or not as neutral as it might otherwise be? The issue of tone & style were not at any time brought into question before your comment, so the sudden appearance of this as a comment left me puzzled. I've read the WP:Deletion policy through carefully the Wikipedia Spam^[1] page and am not sure which words give it the appearance of being biased. Any insight as to specific content in my article that creates this impression would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Looking in, I now saw your comment. Here with articles, we're highly skeptical of including anything when it involves business offers and details like that about the business as it would suggest an business profile or listing, and so the best place for this would be the company website or their social medias, etc. SwisterTwister talk 13:36, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Spam

[1] ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Spam

[1]