User talk:Jadid basmach

January 2024

Hi Jadid basmach! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of List of wars involving Uzbekistan several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:List of wars involving Uzbekistan, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:31, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at List of wars involving Uzbekistan, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:37, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See [1]. --HistoryofIran (talk) 13:49, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - LouisAragon (talk) 14:04, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:57, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at List of wars involving Uzbekistan. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of wars involving Uzbekistan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The list criteria is clear. There are no sources showing these entries meet the list criteria and the entries themselves do no claim to be wars. [2], [3], [4], [5] // Timothy :: talk 15:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of wars involving Uzbekistan ‎. [6] // Timothy :: talk 15:39, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring again; next block will be indefinite

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:43, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ohnoitsjamie are you stupid? actually, I did everything right, you Persians are tired of deleting my battles Jadid basmach (talk) 13:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to have your block increased to indefinite now and your access to this page revoked, you are heading in that direction with the above attack.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block upgraded to indefinite, per WP:NOTHERE

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Any further attacks will result in the loss of your ability to edit this talk page. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]