User talk:JamboJuice

November 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tim Walz has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tim Walz was changed by JamboJuice (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865546 on 2020-11-15T08:05:49+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:05, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

JamboJuice, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi JamboJuice! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Tim Walz

Hello. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Please be aware that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reverts on a single page within a 24 hour period. Rather than reverting edits, please consider using the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. The dispute resolution processes may also help. Excessive reverting may result in a loss of editing privileges. After creating a new account, you've made three reverts in less than 24 hours as seen here: 1st, 2nd, 3rd. You should be seeking consensus on the Talk Page and building support for changing the article instead of making repeated reverts in an attempt to force your desired change to the article's content. Regards, AzureCitizen (talk) 18:37, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no grey area, Army Regulations and documentation is very clear. Unless you held a billet as MOS 00Z and completed relevant PME, you cannot claim to have held the rank of Command Sergeant Major. Unless there is documentation produced which I cited as the NGB 22 or 23 form. Furthermore, other articles regarding reduction in rank do not use the title in the infobox "Highest Rank Attained" but rather "Rank". The Rank held at retirement is listed with the highest rank they were reduced from in parentheses.

Example Bowe Bergdahl's rank is listed as "Private" despite being Adminstratively reduced in rank from "Sergeant".

William E. Wards page lists his rank as "Lieutenant General" The last rank he held but contains in the infobox a addendum "(Reduced in Rank from General).

These are both correct and concise. Infoboxes should be an abridged version of what's in the article. It should not mislead or omit, the unusual infobox format leads me to believe that is the case.

JamboJuice (talk) 06:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]