User talk:Jana Allied Express

January 2018

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jana Allied Express (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

can you please unblock me as I need to add logos and photos. Thank you!

Decline reason:

Procedural close - the unblock template is not a reply button, and multiple requests will not speed up your appeal (or notify anyone) in any way. SQL ^{Query me!} 03:15, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

/* January 2018 */

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Allied Express Marketing (talk · contribs) has been paid by Allied Express Transport Pty Ltd.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Jana Allied Express (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Jana Allied Express (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

As previous username was not acceptable - I request change from Allied Express marketing

Accept reason:

Globally renamed from 'Allied Express Marketing' to 'Jana Allied Express' Just Chilling (talk) 00:11, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jana Allied Express (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

all points below are agreed upon. Username change has been submitted, no further edits are required at this time, also downloaded terms of use to ensure this doesnt happen again

Decline reason:

One of the points was "you indicate what areas of Wikipedia you intend to edit in the future". I don't see that you have done so except by stating that "no further edits are required at this time". If you don't intend to edit, there's no point in unblocking you. You're welcome to request another review of your block when you do intend to edit Wikipedia. Huon (talk) 21:35, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jana Allied Express (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am acting on behalf of our company listing what the company does - this is not advertising material, if some content needs to be removed for this reason please advise which text you are referring to as advertising material

Decline reason:

You will not be unblocked until:

you propose a new username that meets the username policy
you confirm that this account is used by one individual only
you agree to avoid creating or directly editing articles related to your organisation or its clients (requested edits will still be permitted)
you agree to abide by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use and disclose your paid relationship in accordance with the paid contributor policy
you indicate what areas of Wikipedia you intend to edit in the future

If you have no interest in editing Wikipedia beyond writing about your organisation, then you will not be unblocked. If this is the case, I recommend you consider alternative outlets. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:33, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There's four things that need to be addressed here, then:

Usernames implying promotional or shared use are forbidden. You will need to request a username change ({{unblock-un|<username>|<reason>}} is the template you need to use).
Shared accounts in general aren't allowed because they play merry hell with Wikipedia's licensing. Everyone using this account needs to get their own personal accounts and disclose (see below).
Per the Terms of Use you are obligated to disclose your employer. You have not done so.
Wikipedia has a mandatory neutrality policy that it's unlikely you'll be able to satisfy. (This isn't an indictment of your writing; your employment is going to skew your view of "neutral" naturally.) It is extremely likely that you will not be permitted to edit about your company.

Hope this helps explain a few things. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 05:30, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 04:40, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly do not edit other user's comments, as you did here. Your responses to the unblock terms I offered were as follows (numbered for clarity):

you propose a new username that meets the username policy - (this has been submitted)
you confirm that this account is used by one individual only - (this account will definitely only be used by myself)
you agree to avoid creating or directly editing articles related to your organisation or its clients (requested edits will still be permitted) - (this is agreed upon)
you agree to abide by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use and disclose your paid relationship in accordance with the paid contributor policy - (this is agreed upon)
you indicate what areas of Wikipedia you intend to edit in the future - (i dont believe there are any further edits at this point in time, any future edits will be company details)

Your response to point 3 agrees that you will no longer edit articles relating to your company, yet in point 5, you state that the only reason you intend to use Wikipedia is to add your company's details. This is not in any way acceptable. You need to understand that you will not be allowed to write about your company or its clients on Wikipedia, period. If you do not wish to do anything else on Wikipedia, then there is no reason for you to be here; you would be far better off spending your time at MyWikiBiz or a similar promotional site. Yunshui ^雲 _水 23:08, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably it is acceptable for Jana to have an account for requesting updates on the talk page of the article though, Yunshui, even if that is all it is used for? Cordless Larry (talk) 08:15, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Under policy, yes, but given that I've just nominated the article for deletion (and am fairly confident that the consensus will be in favour) there is unlikely to be much point in doing so. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:01, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jana Allied Express (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Huon, I believe we have a misunderstanding. I will not be editing the content previously edited however am required to add relevant content and images that do not pertain to advertising or marketing and are facts only

Decline reason:

Required? Required by whom? In what manner? I need an answer to that, please. I confess I'm a bit confused. Are we all in agreement with the following? This is a restatement of Yunshui's unblock decline. You will:

agree to avoid creating or directly editing articles related to your organisation (requested edits will still be permitted)
agree to abide by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. Please read and heed the paid contributor policy and disclose any paid relationship in accordance therewith
indicate what areas of Wikipedia you intend to edit in the future

If you have no interest in editing Wikipedia beyond writing about your organisation, then you will not be unblocked. If this is the case, I recommend you consider alternative outlets. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:52, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.