User talk:Jasavina

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot[edit]

Hi Jasavina! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:43, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Metal carbonyl cluster may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

clusters are specifically clusters made up primarily of platinum and follow the general formula of {Pt3(CO)6]n2- where n is usually anywhere from 1 to 10.<ref name=Indian>Bhaduri, S.;

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:09, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for Ranked-choice voting in the US[edit]

Thank You Jasavina for making the Map https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:RCV_by_US_state_as_of_August_2023.svg on the page of Ranked-choice voting in the United States. I am just curios if you had time, could you make a Map of The US on Voter participation rules for 2020 presidential primaries and caucuses?? Such as which states have Closed primary and which state have Open primary. One for Republican Party and other for the Democratic party. I found this source that could help you. https://ballotpedia.org/Closed_primary#Presidential_primaries_and_caucuses Muaza Husni (talk) 10:41, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Muaza Husni Unfortunately because I'm disabled I had to ask a friend to do it for me. But, it's fairly easy to do on a computer. Download the SVG and edit it using Inkscape (which is free and open source). If you have any questions let me know, but everything you need to know should be fairly easy to look up online. Jasavina (talk) 14:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Favorite betrayal criterion (November 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were:

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should begin with a good definition, but expand on the subject. You might try creating a definition for this instead at Wiktionary, which is a dictionary. Please only do so if it meets that sister project's criteria for inclusion. These require among others, attestation for the word or phrase, as verified through clear widespread use, or its use in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Favorite betrayal criterion and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:39, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanderwaalforces Thanks for reviewing the submission.

As far as avoiding articles that are pure definitions, I was copying a format I've seen on other accepted articles concerning voting method criteria. For example, the Later-no-harm criterion article is used to section-off the explanation of how the criterion works and public opinion on it.

As far as the neutral tone goes, I can only assume you're concerned about the public opinion section. I tried to find sources I could cite from advocates of voting methods which fail the favorite betrayal criterion, but there just aren't any. That single sentence saying it's generally unaddressed is the best I can do, but if you think it would be better to leave out that claim (since there's no way to cite it) I'm totally fine with that.

Let me know what I can do to improve the article. It's a subject that would benefit from its own article. It already has a redirect page, but the landing location doesn't actually mention the favorite betrayal criterion.

if you left comments elsewhere that I'm accidentally ignoring let me know, but I didn't see any.

cheers,

Jasavina Jasavina (talk) 18:40, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, please remove the statement that you've "tried hard" to verify but couldn't. Resubmit and ping me. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:47, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanderwaalforces

I didn't tag you in time before someone else reviewed it and denied it for different reasons. Would you like me to work with them to get it up to their standards or resubmit and tag you promptly this time? I've got CFS, which means I do all of my work from my phone, but I had to use the laptop to resubmit, which is how tagging you got pushed back too far.

In any case, I made some formating and grammar fixes, so it's not futile work. Jasavina (talk) 20:09, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Favorite betrayal criterion (November 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Favorite betrayal criterion and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:56, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Favorite betrayal criterion (April 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Favorite betrayal criterion and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette ^{(Let's talk together!)} 09:10, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]