User talk:Jason Patton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Note: I prefer to respond here (on my talk page) to discussion that is initiated here. Please watch this page if you are looking for a response!

Global warming[edit]

Hi. I realise that this revert was because the user that inserted it is an abusive sockpuppet, but is the information in the edit itself wrong, or is it Wikipedia policy to revert abusive socks' edits even if they are helpful and regardless of the context? Thanks. ~AH1(TCU) 22:34, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm honestly not sure if there is a rule or not. If someone happens to know that comes by here, I am curious what the policy is. Regarding the revert, I do know of Emanuel's recent publication, and it probably does fit in Global warming under the paragraph that begins "Additional anticipated effects include..." since it mentions Emanuel's previous work (though not directly cited). If I weren't in a rush at the time when I noticed the familiar editing style of the puppeteer, I might have tried to merge it in that paragraph somewhere, as the study doesn't merit an entire paragraph to itself. I think some discussion of what exactly should be done with the study needs to happen in Talk:Global warming, like what User:Rossnixon has started. Jason Patton (talk) 13:42, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
I want to add it looks that the Houston Chronicle article (second source linked in the diff) grossly overstates the conclusions from the BAMS article. Jason Patton (talk) 14:08, 14 April 2008 (UTC)


User:Gpidelt[edit]

I am sorry about all this. its for a class project and i did not do a very good job of working on it earlier. this was all rushed and i appreciate your help with my article. i will be devoting more time to making it a better article and would greatly appreciate your input and help because i'll admit, i'm not sure what is going on. ha. thanks again.--Gpidelt (talk) 12:12, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

No problem! It took me a long time to figure out how this all works too :) Jason Patton (talk) 12:22, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

So fabrictramp, a wikipedia admin, keeps redirecting this page to a list of DTD undergrad chapters. they keep saying that i have no notably or attempt to show it. i'm not sure what they are getting after or what i need but i was hoping you had some insight into the solution. thanks jason. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gpidelt (talkcontribs) 10:53, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Welcome[edit]

Hi Jason. Congratulations on your entry into the Ron Cram Alternative Reality Zone. Be careful, that way madness lies. Raymond Arritt (talk) 01:09, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Shakespeare apparently didn't follow forecasting principles either. Madness is about telling the truth these days. Jason Patton (talk) 06:09, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

BNL[edit]

Just for the record, I left the source for the BNL arrest on Robertson's talk page. And, the Yahoo Music article which I had as a source said Robertson was the one that was arrested. I was careful to notice because I had at first thought it was Page. The page has since been modified to say Page. http://music.yahoo.com/read/news/12176797 Smitherd (talk) 18:11, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

No worries, though there was a mistake somewhere in your addition as your reference just linked to the number 4! That perplexed me for a bit. Ah well, no matter now. If your edit somehow ever gets you in trouble, I'll vouch for you. Jason Patton (talk) 18:15, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Awesome, man. I was a little disappointed to hear that he was arrested... I also found it particularly ironic that he was arrested right after releasing Snacktime. Smitherd (talk) 21:38, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I'm with you on that one. BNL's always been one of my favorite bands, though I haven't actually followed them quite as much lately as I have in the past. It sounds like Page has been going through some stressful times, though it's no excuse. Still, I hope that everything gets worked out in a respectful manner and that he gets his life back in gear. Jason Patton (talk) 01:24, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Comments needed[edit]

You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active participant in WikiProject Meteorology, WikiProject Severe weather, and/or WikiProject Non-tropical storms. I have made a proposal to start an official assessment page for these three projects, under the WP:METEO banner. Since this would need significant participation to work properly, I'd like input from as many interested parties as possible (even those who may not watch the project pages), so please visit the discussion here and leave your thoughts/opinions. Thanks! -RunningOnBrains 02:42, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies[edit]

Hi. I would like to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change. If interested, please get in touch via my talkpage or email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 16:49, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Hmm, not behind a proxy[edit]

I'm a Mediacom customer that's currently assigned an IP on their 173.16.0.0/12 block, which apparently someone in my range or that previously had my IP set up a proxy (which has been subsequently blocked). Can anyone help me out? Jason Patton (talk) 06:52, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Artículo bueno.svg

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Block conditions of 173.26.191.18 changed to allow editing by named accounts.

Request handled by: JamesBWatson (talk)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Thanks! Jason Patton (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

UVB-76 Discussion Page[edit]

Hello, I've recently added some information at the UVB-76 Discussion Page that I would like some additional input on; as you've been fairly active with the article and discussion, your input would be appreciated. Aeternitas827 (talk) 06:16, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UVB-76[edit]

  • You may be interested in the vote. A-Day (c)(t) 23:00, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)