User talk:Jasper Deng/Archive 35
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Jasper Deng. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 30 | ← | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 |
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Recent Revert on Fork (chess)
I have noticed that you have reverted my change on the page Fork (chess) and that you have provided a supposedly winning continuation for black. However, it is to note that your proposed 6...Nxc3 is illegal, as there is nothing on c3. The previous moves were 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 Nxe4 5.Bxf7+ Ne7 6.d4. As shown, white has never noved any piece to c3. Could you please recheck your analysis and provide an unbiased analysis of the position? Thank you for reconsidering my contributions. 2003 LN6 (talk) 16:28, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- @2003 LN6: I'm really not interested, because your addition is still original research and unsourced. Also, the move cited in the article is 4.Nc3, not 4.Ng5, so your analysis is completely wrong. This is why we do not allow original research on Wikipedia.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:12, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Yo Ho Ho!
Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec19b}} to your friends' talk pages.
Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 07:35, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 15
An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Mahindra Racing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fortune.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
I apologize; I misread that table as being new records set during the women's event, not the previous records held. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:07, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, though feel free to delete the Europeans number specifically, since it's now voided indeed.--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:14, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello Jasper
I read an article about Typhoon Jova and it said that it was one of the five fastest intensifying Pacific hurricane on record, however, they did not specify that besides Jova in 5th or 6th place, otherwise, what is the name of the storm ranked above? Can you list the storm name for me? Vệ Thần - Talk 12:12, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to join New pages patrol
Hello Jasper Deng!
- The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
- We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
- Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
- If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
 | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Jasper Deng! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC) |  |
A-class review
Hey pal, some members of WikiProject Figure Skating have finally set up an A-class assessment procedure. Our very first article to be nominated is Yuna Kim. We're having challenges finding reviewers (we need at least three) because so many of us have worked on Kim's bio. Would you mind reviewing it? It'd be much appreciated. Thanks, long time no talk to, hope you're doing well. Wikipedia:WikiProject Figure Skating/Assessment/Yuna Kim. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 17:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
June 2024 — Administrators’ noticeboard/Incidents notification
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 18:10, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Discussion was ongoing, but I have pinged you in the discussion. Per AN/I, I am required to notify you. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 18:10, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Yuna Kim A-class assessment
Hey pal, I thought I'd ping you again, since my last request got archived, and you might not have seen it. We need a third reviewer, please help! It's here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Figure Skating/Assessment/Yuna Kim. Thanks and best, Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 22:27, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at WP:Administrators' noticeboard regarding Rollback abuse. Thank you. — Jeaucques Quœure (talk) 07:45, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
PD-NWS Violations Update #2 (Key To Read Third Section)
I am providing members of the WikiProject of Weather along with users who frequently edit weather-related articles an new update (2nd update) to the discussions regarding the PD-NWS image copyright template.
On the Commons, an RFC discussion is taking place to figure out how to manage the template. No "formal" administrative-style rules have occurred, so nothing has changed. That is not a surprise as the RFC is still ongoing.
What is new?
- The entire Template:PD-NWS has been placed inside a "License Review" template, which is viewable via the link aforementioned.
- Most of the photographs which were uploaded to the Commons originally under the PD-NWS template (approximately 1,500) have been reviewed. Out of those ~1,500 images, only about 150 are requiring additional looks. Most images have been verified as free-to-use and switched to a respective, valid template.
- As of this moment, approximately 50 photos have been nominated for deletion (results pending).
- A handful of images have been deleted (either confirmed copyrighted or under the Commons precautionary principle).
- One image has been kept following a deletion request under the PD-NWS template.
How to deal with new photos?
Given all of this, you might be wondering how the heck you use weather photos while creating articles? Well, here is what you can do!
- If the photo was made by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (excluding NWS), You can upload it under the PD-NOAA template via {{PD-NOAA}}.
- If the photo was made by the National Weather Service (NOT Third Party), you can upload it using the new PD-NWS-employee template via {{PD-USGov-NWS-employee}}.
- If the photo originates on the Damage Assessment Toolkit, you can upload it using the PD-DAT template via {{PD-DAT}}.
- If the photo is from a U.S. NEXRAD radar, you can upload it using the PD-NEXRAD template via via {{PD-NEXRAD}}.
What about third-party photos?
In the case of third-party photos...i.e. ones not taken by the National Weather Service themselves...there is an option which was discussed and confirmed to be valid from an English Wikipedia Administrator.
- KEY: Third party images of tornadoes & weather-related content can potentially be uploaded via Wikipedia's Non-Free Content Guidelines!
- Experiments/testing has been done already! In fact, I bet you couldn't tell the difference, but the tornado photograph used at the top of the 2011 Joplin tornado was already switched to a Non-Free File (NFF)! Check it out: File:Photograph of the 2011 Joplin tornado.jpeg! That photo's description can also be used as a template for future third-party tornado photographs uploaded to Wikipedia...with their respective information replaced.
- NFFs can be uploaded to multiple articles as well!
- The absolute key aspect of NFFs is that they relate to the article and are not decoration. For example with the Joplin tornado, the photograph: (1) shows the size of the tornado, (2) shows the "wall of darkness", which was described by witnesses, (3) shows a historic, non-repeatable event of the deadliest tornado in modern U.S. history. The exact reasoning does not have to be extremely specific as Wikipedia's NFF guidelines "is one of the most generous in the world" (words of Rlandmann (not pinged), the administrator reviewing all the PD-NWS template images).
- Tornado photographs will almost certainly qualify under the NFF guidelines, especially for tornadoes with standalone articles or standalone sections.
- NFFs cannot be used when a free-photograph is available, no matter the quality, unless the section is about that specific photograph. For example, the photograph used at the top of the 2013 Moore tornado article is confirmed to be free-to-use, therefore, no NFFs of that tornado can be uploaded on Wikipedia. However, the "Dead Man Walking" photograph could almost certainly be uploaded as an NFF to the 1997 Jarrell tornado article as that photograph is the topic of a section in the article.
- NFFs currently on Wikipedia can and should be placed in this category: Category:Non-free pictures of tornadoes.
Update Closing
Hopefully all of that information kept you informed on the Commons copyright discussion process and how you can still create the best articles possible! If you have a question about something mentioned above, reply back and I will do my best to answer it! Also, ping me in the process to ensure I see it! Have a good day! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 01:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
About the deletion nominations.
I am fine with the articles getting nominated for deletion, just give me one week and I'll transfer all the articles to linguifex.com, thanks!
12:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC) Sisixive (talk) 12:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC)