User talk:Jenamani
Appearance
This is Jenamani's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 14)
[edit] Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jenamani/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Jenamani/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Jenamani!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:55, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
|
Disruptive editing of WP:Mukunda Deva
[edit]Hi Jenamani, I’d like to inform you that one of your edits in WP:Mukunda Deva has been removed without explanation. Seems like you added a reliable source as well. Let me know if you need any help with complaining against users who go against Wikipedia policies and do disruptive editing/removing of content. RudolphHitz (talk) 15:33, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- This is bad advice. You should use the article talk page if you have an issue. If the issue is over whether a source is reliable, you can go to WP:RSN. Both of you are new editors and it takes time to know what sources we can use and how. Doug Weller talk 08:26, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Odiahistory per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Odiahistory. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:58, 19 July 2021 (UTC)