User talk:Jerry121

Welcome

Hello, Brissard, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents / Department directory

• The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

• Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
• Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

• Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
• Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

• Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Brissard, good luck, and have fun. – P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Grand-Calumet

Please discuss changes at the talk page first, as per WP:BRD. Repeated reversals of edits without discussing them is against WP policy. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 03:23, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

• This is the last warning to engage in discussion at Talk:L'Île-du-Grand-Calumet, Quebec before I will move it to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:05, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

I have once more discussed your changes on Talk:L'Île-du-Grand-Calumet, Quebec, now in more detail. Instead of just reverting and ignoring the warnings and block, please discuss the changes there. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:45, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 21:46, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Drmies (talk) 01:32, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

Your recent editing history at L'Île-du-Grand-Calumet, Quebec shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Having recently come of a block for edit-warring, I would suggest that it is unwise to immediately recommence the same behaviour. Bon chance. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Jerry121 reported by User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (Result: ). Thank you. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 13:42, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for edit warring, as you did at L'Île-du-Grand-Calumet, Quebec. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  regentspark (comment) 15:29, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at L'Île-du-Grand-Calumet, Quebec, you may be blocked from editing. I have asked you numerous times to discuss the changes to this article. I am more than willing to consider good changes but you haven't said anything on the talk page. The comments in the Edit Summary don't support your edits (and doesn't constitute discussion), and now you are resorting to vandalism by removing properly referenced info. Next time it goes to WP:AIV. P 1 9 9  ✉ 12:49, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  regentspark (comment) 15:26, 12 April 2016 (UTC)