Jump to content

User talk:Jerseyman abroard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jerseyman abroard, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Jerseyman abroard! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! AmaryllisGardener (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:22, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tags on Albrecht Lanz

[edit]

Hi. The notability tag indicates that I am questioning the notability of this officer. However, two of the three sources are good. The third appears to be a self-published book. This doesn't in itself make it unreliable, but see WP:SELFPUB.Deb (talk) 10:56, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Deb, I am aware what the notability tag means. I'm not sure where it says the third is self-published, I highly suspect that Roth is dead. I left an analysis of the sources on your talk page. What I was curious about was what doesn't make him notable, as he has his nation's highest award for valour, and commandant of the entire Channel Islands. Thanks, Jerseyman abroard (talk) 11:01, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry if I wasn't clear. It's the Barry Turner book that appears to be self-published. As for notability, I was meaning to emphasize the word "questioning" rather than my stating outright that he's not notable. If I was sure he wasn't notable, I'd probably have deleted the article. Have a look at other articles on other German officers and also the Wikipedia:Notability page (if you haven't already). It would be a good idea to have at least his dates of birth and death in the article. Deb (talk) 11:49, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, I was wondering if you meant the other source when writing a reply. Turner's book was called a "new and well-balanced account" by The Mail, and was used in depth both on The Mail and BBC websites to analyse the actions of Churchill and the Channel Islands. I took a look at the MILHIST guidelines before writing the article, and they state:

"In particular, individuals will almost always have sufficient coverage to qualify if they:

  • Were awarded their nation's highest award for valour;[1] or
  • Played an important role in a significant military event"

Lanz did both of those, hence my article. I share your frustration that there are not more facts available, (actually, I've just found some dates). Given that the sources are reliable and he is notable under notability guidelines, would it be possible to remove the tags please Deb? Thanks, Jerseyman abroard (talk) 12:06, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds okay. I'll untag it but maybe you could copy this discussion to the talk page for the article, to make sure it's clear we've discussed it. Deb (talk) 12:11, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much, I'll do that. Thank you for discussing so promptly. All the best, Jerseyman abroard (talk) 12:13, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brothers

[edit]

Yes, it is well documented on page 248 in

  • Stockert, Peter (1997). Die Eichenlaubträger 1939–1945 Band 2 (in German). Bad Friedrichshall, Germany: Friedrichshaller Rundblick. ISBN 978-3-9802222-9-7. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (|trans-title= suggested) (help)

Cheers MisterBee1966 (talk) 10:59, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I had to change his birth date and location. He was the younger brother of Hubert Lanz and my printed references contradict the WW2Awards.com website. You may also want to check here. MisterBee1966 (talk) 11:18, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. I thought 50 was a little old to still be fighting, 43 seems more realistic, and I had my doubts about WW2Awards.com as a RS. Thanks for all the help, Jerseyman abroard (talk) 11:24, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jerseyman abroard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Old Government House".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 02:11, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Benjamin Campbell (spy)

[edit]

Hello, Jerseyman abroard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Benjamin Campbell".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 03:16, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]