User talk:Jey0h

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image tagging for Image:Lamont, CA.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Lamont, CA.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:07, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image copyright problem with Image:McFarland.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:McFarland.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:46, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shafter Pic[edit]

Looks great, thanks alot /thumbsup —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.38.70.167 (talk) 23:14, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Lake of the Woods.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Hi Jey0h!
We thank you for uploading Image:Lake of the Woods.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 20:30, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Boron.jpg[edit]

File:Boron.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Old Town Boron entrance sign.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Old Town Boron entrance sign.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:12, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:Maricopa.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Maricopa.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 12:13, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:McFarland_2.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:McFarland_2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 12:16, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:Gosford.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Gosford.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 12:16, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:Wasco.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Wasco.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 12:16, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Delano.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Delano.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:20, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to File:Shafter.jpg, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Cst17 (talk) 09:42, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect photo entry for Rosedale, (Columbus, Mississippi)[edit]

Hello. The photo that you posted for the historic property Rosedale, in Columbus, MS, is incorrect. Can you please delete it so that I can submit a correct photograph? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Architeresa (talkcontribs) 23:00, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:City of Mojave.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]